Matrimonial and Family Proceedings Act 1984
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
31W Alternatives to cross-examination in person
(1) This section applies where a party to family proceedings is prevented from cross-examining a witness in person by virtue of any of sections 31R to 31U. (2) The court must consider whether (ignoring this section) there is a satisfactory alternative means— (a) for the witness to be cross-examined in the proceedings, or (b) of obtaining evidence that the witness might have given under cross-examination in the proceedings. (3) If the court decides that there is not, the court must— (a) invite the party to the proceedings to arrange for a qualified legal representative to act for the party for the purpose of cross-examining the witness, and (b) require the party to the proceedings to notify the court, by the end of a period specified by the court, of whether a qualified legal representative is to act for the party for that purpose. (4) Subsection (5) applies if, by the end of the period specified under subsection (3)(b), either— (a) the party has notified the court that no qualified legal representative is to act for the party for the purpose of cross-examining the witness, or (b) no notification has been received by the court and it appears to the court that no qualified legal representative is to act for the party for the purpose of cross-examining the witness. (5) The court must consider whether it is necessary in the interests of justice for the witness to be cross-examined by a qualified legal representative appointed by the court to represent the interests of the party. (6) If the court decides that it is, the court must appoint a qualified legal representative (chosen by the court) to cross-examine the witness in the interests of the party. (7) A qualified legal representative appointed by the court under subsection (6) is not responsible to the party. (8) For the purposes of this section— (a) a reference to cross-examination includes a reference to continuing to conduct cross-examination; (b) “qualified legal representative” means a person who, for the purposes of the Legal Services Act 2007, is an authorised person in relation to an activity which constitutes the exercise of a right of audience (within the meaning of that Act) in family proceedings.
31W Alternatives to cross-examination in person
(1) This section applies where a party to family proceedings is prevented from cross-examining a witness in person by virtue of any of sections 31R to 31U. (2) The court must consider whether (ignoring this section) there is a satisfactory alternative means— (a) for the witness to be cross-examined in the proceedings, or (b) of obtaining evidence that the witness might have given under cross-examination in the proceedings. (3) If the court decides that there is not, the court must— (a) invite the party to the proceedings to arrange for a qualified legal representative to act for the party for the purpose of cross-examining the witness, and (b) require the party to the proceedings to notify the court, by the end of a period specified by the court, of whether a qualified legal representative is to act for the party for that purpose. (4) Subsection (5) applies if, by the end of the period specified under subsection (3)(b), either— (a) the party has notified the court that no qualified legal representative is to act for the party for the purpose of cross-examining the witness, or (b) no notification has been received by the court and it appears to the court that no qualified legal representative is to act for the party for the purpose of cross-examining the witness. (5) The court must consider whether it is necessary in the interests of justice for the witness to be cross-examined by a qualified legal representative appointed by the court to represent the interests of the party. (6) If the court decides that it is, the court must appoint a qualified legal representative (chosen by the court) to cross-examine the witness in the interests of the party. (7) A qualified legal representative appointed by the court under subsection (6) is not responsible to the party. (8) For the purposes of this section— (a) a reference to cross-examination includes a reference to continuing to conduct cross-examination; (b) “qualified legal representative” means a person who, for the purposes of the Legal Services Act 2007, is an authorised person in relation to an activity which constitutes the exercise of a right of audience (within the meaning of that Act) in family proceedings.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.