Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
14A Appeal to Supreme Court: grant of certificate by Upper Tribunal
(1) If the Upper Tribunal is satisfied that— (a) the conditions in subsection (4) or (5) are fulfilled in relation to the Upper Tribunal's decision in any proceedings, and (b) as regards that decision, a sufficient case for an appeal to the Supreme Court has been made out to justify an application under section 14B, the Upper Tribunal may grant a certificate to that effect. (2) The Upper Tribunal may grant a certificate under this section only on an application made by a party to the proceedings. (3) The Upper Tribunal may grant a certificate under this section only if the relevant appellate court as regards the proceedings is— (a) the Court of Appeal in England and Wales, or (b) the Court of Appeal in Northern Ireland. (4) The conditions in this subsection are that a point of law of general public importance is involved in the decision of the Upper Tribunal and that point of law is— (a) a point of law that— (i) relates wholly or mainly to the construction of an enactment or statutory instrument, and (ii) has been fully argued in the proceedings and fully considered in the judgment of the Upper Tribunal in the proceedings, or (b) a point of law— (i) in respect of which the Upper Tribunal is bound by a decision of the relevant appellate court or the Supreme Court in previous proceedings, and (ii) that was fully considered in the judgments given by the relevant appellate court or, as the case may be, the Supreme Court in those previous proceedings. (5) The conditions in this subsection are that a point of law of general public importance is involved in the decision of the Upper Tribunal and that— (a) the proceedings entail a decision relating to a matter of national importance or consideration of such a matter, (b) the result of the proceedings is so significant (whether considered on its own or together with other proceedings or likely proceedings) that, in the opinion of the Upper Tribunal, a hearing by the Supreme Court is justified, or (c) the Upper Tribunal is satisfied that the benefits of earlier consideration by the Supreme Court outweigh the benefits of consideration by the Court of Appeal. (6) Before the Upper Tribunal decides an application made to it under this section, the Upper Tribunal must specify the court that would be the relevant appellate court if the application were an application for permission (or leave) under section 13. (7) In this section except subsection (6) and in sections 14B and 14C, “the relevant appellate court”, as respects an application, means the court specified as respects that application by the Upper Tribunal under subsection (6). (8) No appeal lies against the grant or refusal of a certificate under subsection (1).
14A Appeal to Supreme Court: grant of certificate by Upper Tribunal
(1) If the Upper Tribunal is satisfied that— (a) the conditions in subsection (4) or (5) are fulfilled in relation to the Upper Tribunal's decision in any proceedings, and (b) as regards that decision, a sufficient case for an appeal to the Supreme Court has been made out to justify an application under section 14B, the Upper Tribunal may grant a certificate to that effect. (2) The Upper Tribunal may grant a certificate under this section only on an application made by a party to the proceedings. (3) The Upper Tribunal may grant a certificate under this section only if the relevant appellate court as regards the proceedings is— (a) the Court of Appeal in England and Wales, or (b) the Court of Appeal in Northern Ireland. (4) The conditions in this subsection are that a point of law of general public importance is involved in the decision of the Upper Tribunal and that point of law is— (a) a point of law that— (i) relates wholly or mainly to the construction of an enactment or statutory instrument, and (ii) has been fully argued in the proceedings and fully considered in the judgment of the Upper Tribunal in the proceedings, or (b) a point of law— (i) in respect of which the Upper Tribunal is bound by a decision of the relevant appellate court or the Supreme Court in previous proceedings, and (ii) that was fully considered in the judgments given by the relevant appellate court or, as the case may be, the Supreme Court in those previous proceedings. (5) The conditions in this subsection are that a point of law of general public importance is involved in the decision of the Upper Tribunal and that— (a) the proceedings entail a decision relating to a matter of national importance or consideration of such a matter, (b) the result of the proceedings is so significant (whether considered on its own or together with other proceedings or likely proceedings) that, in the opinion of the Upper Tribunal, a hearing by the Supreme Court is justified, or (c) the Upper Tribunal is satisfied that the benefits of earlier consideration by the Supreme Court outweigh the benefits of consideration by the Court of Appeal. (6) Before the Upper Tribunal decides an application made to it under this section, the Upper Tribunal must specify the court that would be the relevant appellate court if the application were an application for permission (or leave) under section 13. (7) In this section except subsection (6) and in sections 14B and 14C, “the relevant appellate court”, as respects an application, means the court specified as respects that application by the Upper Tribunal under subsection (6). (8) No appeal lies against the grant or refusal of a certificate under subsection (1).
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.