Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
As published
17 Quashing orders under section 15(1): supplementary provision
(A1) In cases arising under the law of England and Wales, section 29A of the Senior Courts Act 1981 applies in relation to a quashing order under section 15(1)(c) of this Act as it applies in relation to a quashing order under section 29 of that Act.
(1) If the Upper Tribunal makes a quashing order under section 15(1)(c) in respect of a decision, it may in addition—
(a) remit the matter concerned to the court, tribunal or authority that made the decision, with a direction to reconsider the matter and reach a decision in accordance with the findings of the Upper Tribunal, or
(b) substitute its own decision for the decision in question.
(2) The power conferred by subsection (1)(b) is exercisable only if—
(a) the decision in question was made by a court or tribunal,
(b) the quashing order is made on the ground that there has been an error of law, and
(c) without the error, there would have been only one decision that the court or tribunal could have reached.
(3) Unless the Upper Tribunal otherwise directs, a decision substituted by it under subsection (1)(b) has effect as if it were a decision of the relevant court or tribunal.
Your change, as a redline
17 Quashing orders under section 15(1): supplementary provision
(A1) In cases arising under the law of England and Wales, section 29A of the Senior Courts Act 1981 applies in relation to a quashing order under section 15(1)(c) of this Act as it applies in relation to a quashing order under section 29 of that Act.
(1) If the Upper Tribunal makes a quashing order under section 15(1)(c) in respect of a decision, it may in addition—
(a) remit the matter concerned to the court, tribunal or authority that made the decision, with a direction to reconsider the matter and reach a decision in accordance with the findings of the Upper Tribunal, or
(b) substitute its own decision for the decision in question.
(2) The power conferred by subsection (1)(b) is exercisable only if—
(a) the decision in question was made by a court or tribunal,
(b) the quashing order is made on the ground that there has been an error of law, and
(c) without the error, there would have been only one decision that the court or tribunal could have reached.
(3) Unless the Upper Tribunal otherwise directs, a decision substituted by it under subsection (1)(b) has effect as if it were a decision of the relevant court or tribunal.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.