Propose a change

Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

6 Certain judges who are also judges of First-tier Tribunal and Upper Tribunal

(1) A person is within this subsection (and so, by virtue of sections 4(1)(c) and 5(1)(g), is a judge of the First-tier Tribunal and of the Upper Tribunal) if the person— (za) is the Lord Chief Justice of England and Wales, (zb) is the Master of the Rolls, (zc) is the President of the Queen's Bench Division of the High Court in England and Wales, (zd) is the President of the Family Division of the High Court in England and Wales, (ze) is the President of the Business and Property Division of the High Court in England and Wales, (a) is an ordinary judge of the Court of Appeal in England and Wales (including the vice-president, if any, of either division of that Court), (b) is a Lord Justice of Appeal in Northern Ireland, (c) is a judge of the Court of Session, (d) is a puisne judge of the High Court in England and Wales or Northern Ireland, (da) is a deputy judge of the High Court in England and Wales, (db) is the Judge Advocate General, (e) is a circuit judge, (ea) is a Recorder, (f) is a sheriff in Scotland, (g) is a county court judge in Northern Ireland, (h) is a district judge in England and Wales or Northern Ireland, ... (i) is a District Judge (Magistrates' Courts). (j) is the President of Employment Tribunals (England and Wales), (k) is the President of Employment Tribunals (Scotland), (l) is the Vice President of Employment Tribunals (Scotland), or (m) is a Regional Employment Judge. (2) References in subsection (1)(c) to (i) to office-holders do not include deputies or temporary office-holders.

Your change, as a redline

6 Certain judges who are also judges of First-tier Tribunal and Upper Tribunal

(1) A person is within this subsection (and so, by virtue of sections 4(1)(c) and 5(1)(g), is a judge of the First-tier Tribunal and of the Upper Tribunal) if the person— (za) is the Lord Chief Justice of England and Wales, (zb) is the Master of the Rolls, (zc) is the President of the Queen's Bench Division of the High Court in England and Wales, (zd) is the President of the Family Division of the High Court in England and Wales, (ze) is the President of the Business and Property Division of the High Court in England and Wales, (a) is an ordinary judge of the Court of Appeal in England and Wales (including the vice-president, if any, of either division of that Court), (b) is a Lord Justice of Appeal in Northern Ireland, (c) is a judge of the Court of Session, (d) is a puisne judge of the High Court in England and Wales or Northern Ireland, (da) is a deputy judge of the High Court in England and Wales, (db) is the Judge Advocate General, (e) is a circuit judge, (ea) is a Recorder, (f) is a sheriff in Scotland, (g) is a county court judge in Northern Ireland, (h) is a district judge in England and Wales or Northern Ireland, ... (i) is a District Judge (Magistrates' Courts). (j) is the President of Employment Tribunals (England and Wales), (k) is the President of Employment Tribunals (Scotland), (l) is the Vice President of Employment Tribunals (Scotland), or (m) is a Regional Employment Judge. (2) References in subsection (1)(c) to (i) to office-holders do not include deputies or temporary office-holders.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds