Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
79 Use of CRAR after end of lease
(1) When the lease ends, CRAR ceases to be exercisable, with these exceptions. (2) CRAR continues to be exercisable in relation to goods taken control of under it— (a) before the lease ended, or (b) under subsection (3). (3) CRAR continues to be exercisable in relation to rent due and payable before the lease ended, if the conditions in subsection (4) are met. (4) These are the conditions— (a) the lease did not end by forfeiture; (b) not more than 6 months has passed since the day when it ended; (c) the rent was due from the person who was the tenant at the end of the lease; (d) that person remains in possession of any part of the demised premises; (e) any new lease under which that person remains in possession is a lease of commercial premises; (f) the person who was the landlord at the end of the lease remains entitled to the immediate reversion. (5) In deciding whether a person remains in possession under a new lease, section 74(2) (lease to be evidenced in writing) does not apply. (6) In the case of a tenancy by estoppel, the person who was the landlord remains “entitled to the immediate reversion” if the estoppel with regard to the tenancy continues. (7) A lease ends when the tenant ceases to be entitled to possession of the demised premises under the lease together with any continuation of it by operation of an enactment or of a rule of law.
79 Use of CRAR after end of lease
(1) When the lease ends, CRAR ceases to be exercisable, with these exceptions. (2) CRAR continues to be exercisable in relation to goods taken control of under it— (a) before the lease ended, or (b) under subsection (3). (3) CRAR continues to be exercisable in relation to rent due and payable before the lease ended, if the conditions in subsection (4) are met. (4) These are the conditions— (a) the lease did not end by forfeiture; (b) not more than 6 months has passed since the day when it ended; (c) the rent was due from the person who was the tenant at the end of the lease; (d) that person remains in possession of any part of the demised premises; (e) any new lease under which that person remains in possession is a lease of commercial premises; (f) the person who was the landlord at the end of the lease remains entitled to the immediate reversion. (5) In deciding whether a person remains in possession under a new lease, section 74(2) (lease to be evidenced in writing) does not apply. (6) In the case of a tenancy by estoppel, the person who was the landlord remains “entitled to the immediate reversion” if the estoppel with regard to the tenancy continues. (7) A lease ends when the tenant ceases to be entitled to possession of the demised premises under the lease together with any continuation of it by operation of an enactment or of a rule of law.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.