Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
93 Payment by instalments: making and enforcing charging orders
(1) Subsections (2), (3) and (4) make amendments to the Charging Orders Act 1979 (c. 53). (2) In section 1 (charging orders), after subsection (5) insert— (6) Subsections (7) and (8) apply where, under a judgment or order of the High Court or the county court, a debtor is required to pay a sum of money by instalments. (7) The fact that there has been no default in payment of the instalments does not prevent a charging order from being made in respect of that sum. (8) But if there has been no default, the court must take that into account when considering the circumstances of the case under subsection (5). (3) In section 3 (provisions supplementing sections 1 and 2), after subsection (4) insert— (4A) Subsections (4C) to (4E) apply where— (a) a debtor is required to pay a sum of money in instalments under a judgment or order of the High Court or the county court (an “instalments order”), and (b) a charge has been imposed by a charging order in respect of that sum. (4B) In subsections (4C) to (4E) references to the enforcement of a charge are to the making of an order for the enforcement of the charge. (4C) The charge may not be enforced unless there has been default in payment of an instalment under the instalments order. (4D) Rules of court may— (a) provide that, if there has been default in payment of an instalment, the charge may be enforced only in prescribed cases, and (b) limit the amounts for which, and the times at which, the charge may be enforced. (4E) Except so far as otherwise provided by rules of court under subsection (4D)— (a) the charge may be enforced, if there has been default in payment of an instalment, for the whole of the sum of money secured by the charge and the costs then remaining unpaid, or for such part as the court may order, but (b) the charge may not be enforced unless, at the time of enforcement, the whole or part of an instalment which has become due under the instalments order remains unpaid. (4) In section 6(2) (meaning of references to judgment or order of High Court or county court), for “section 1” substitute “ sections 1 and 3 ”. (5) In section 313(4) of the Insolvency Act 1986 (c. 45) (charge on bankrupt's home: certain provisions of section 3 of Charging Orders Act 1979 to apply), for the words before “section 3” substitute “ Subsection (1), (2), (4), (5) and (6) of ”. (6) This section does not apply in a case where a judgment or order of the High Court or the county court under which a debtor is required to pay a sum of money by instalments was made, or applied for, before the coming into force of this section.
93 Payment by instalments: making and enforcing charging orders
(1) Subsections (2), (3) and (4) make amendments to the Charging Orders Act 1979 (c. 53). (2) In section 1 (charging orders), after subsection (5) insert— (6) Subsections (7) and (8) apply where, under a judgment or order of the High Court or the county court, a debtor is required to pay a sum of money by instalments. (7) The fact that there has been no default in payment of the instalments does not prevent a charging order from being made in respect of that sum. (8) But if there has been no default, the court must take that into account when considering the circumstances of the case under subsection (5). (3) In section 3 (provisions supplementing sections 1 and 2), after subsection (4) insert— (4A) Subsections (4C) to (4E) apply where— (a) a debtor is required to pay a sum of money in instalments under a judgment or order of the High Court or the county court (an “instalments order”), and (b) a charge has been imposed by a charging order in respect of that sum. (4B) In subsections (4C) to (4E) references to the enforcement of a charge are to the making of an order for the enforcement of the charge. (4C) The charge may not be enforced unless there has been default in payment of an instalment under the instalments order. (4D) Rules of court may— (a) provide that, if there has been default in payment of an instalment, the charge may be enforced only in prescribed cases, and (b) limit the amounts for which, and the times at which, the charge may be enforced. (4E) Except so far as otherwise provided by rules of court under subsection (4D)— (a) the charge may be enforced, if there has been default in payment of an instalment, for the whole of the sum of money secured by the charge and the costs then remaining unpaid, or for such part as the court may order, but (b) the charge may not be enforced unless, at the time of enforcement, the whole or part of an instalment which has become due under the instalments order remains unpaid. (4) In section 6(2) (meaning of references to judgment or order of High Court or county court), for “section 1” substitute “ sections 1 and 3 ”. (5) In section 313(4) of the Insolvency Act 1986 (c. 45) (charge on bankrupt's home: certain provisions of section 3 of Charging Orders Act 1979 to apply), for the words before “section 3” substitute “ Subsection (1), (2), (4), (5) and (6) of ”. (6) This section does not apply in a case where a judgment or order of the High Court or the county court under which a debtor is required to pay a sum of money by instalments was made, or applied for, before the coming into force of this section.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.