The Stonestreet Green Solar Order 2025
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
43 Felling or lopping of trees or removal of hedgerows
(1) Subject to paragraphs (2) and (6), the undertaker may fell or lop any tree or shrub near any part of the authorised development, or cut back its roots, if it reasonably believes it to be necessary to do so to prevent the tree or shrub— (a) from obstructing or interfering with the construction, maintenance operation or decommissioning of the authorised development or any apparatus used in connection with the authorised development; or (b) from constituting a danger to persons using the authorised development. (2) In carrying out any activity authorised by paragraph (1), the undertaker must do no unnecessary damage to any tree or shrub and must pay compensation to any person for any loss or damage arising from such activity. (3) Any dispute as to a person’s entitlement to compensation under paragraph (2), or as to the amount of compensation, must be determined under Part 1 (determination of questions of disputed compensation) of the 1961 Act. (4) The undertaker may for the purposes of the authorised development— (a) remove those parts of the important hedgerows within the Order limits and specified in Part 1 (removal of important hedgerows) of Schedule 15 (hedgerows); and (b) remove those parts of the hedgerows as are within the Order limits and specified in Part 2 (removal of hedgerows) of Schedule 15 (hedgerows). (5) In this article “hedgerow” and “important hedgerow” have the same meaning as in the Hedgerow Regulations 1997. (6) The undertaker may fell or lop any tree that is subject to a tree preservation order within or overhanging land within the Order limits or cut back its roots if it reasonably believes it to be necessary to do so in order to prevent the tree from obstructing or interfering with the construction, maintenance, operation or decommissioning of the authorised development or any apparatus used in connection with the authorised development. (7) In carrying out any activity authorised by paragraph (6)— (a) the undertaker must do no unnecessary damage to any tree and must pay compensation to any person for any loss or damage arising from such activity; and (b) the duty contained in section 206(1) (replacement of trees) of the 1990 Act does not apply. (8) The authority given by paragraph (6) constitutes a deemed consent under the relevant tree preservation order. (9) Any dispute as to a person’s entitlement to compensation under paragraph (7), or as to the amount of compensation, is to be determined under Part 1 (determination of questions of disputed compensation) of the 1961 Act.
43 Felling or lopping of trees or removal of hedgerows
(1) Subject to paragraphs (2) and (6), the undertaker may fell or lop any tree or shrub near any part of the authorised development, or cut back its roots, if it reasonably believes it to be necessary to do so to prevent the tree or shrub— (a) from obstructing or interfering with the construction, maintenance operation or decommissioning of the authorised development or any apparatus used in connection with the authorised development; or (b) from constituting a danger to persons using the authorised development. (2) In carrying out any activity authorised by paragraph (1), the undertaker must do no unnecessary damage to any tree or shrub and must pay compensation to any person for any loss or damage arising from such activity. (3) Any dispute as to a person’s entitlement to compensation under paragraph (2), or as to the amount of compensation, must be determined under Part 1 (determination of questions of disputed compensation) of the 1961 Act. (4) The undertaker may for the purposes of the authorised development— (a) remove those parts of the important hedgerows within the Order limits and specified in Part 1 (removal of important hedgerows) of Schedule 15 (hedgerows); and (b) remove those parts of the hedgerows as are within the Order limits and specified in Part 2 (removal of hedgerows) of Schedule 15 (hedgerows). (5) In this article “hedgerow” and “important hedgerow” have the same meaning as in the Hedgerow Regulations 1997. (6) The undertaker may fell or lop any tree that is subject to a tree preservation order within or overhanging land within the Order limits or cut back its roots if it reasonably believes it to be necessary to do so in order to prevent the tree from obstructing or interfering with the construction, maintenance, operation or decommissioning of the authorised development or any apparatus used in connection with the authorised development. (7) In carrying out any activity authorised by paragraph (6)— (a) the undertaker must do no unnecessary damage to any tree and must pay compensation to any person for any loss or damage arising from such activity; and (b) the duty contained in section 206(1) (replacement of trees) of the 1990 Act does not apply. (8) The authority given by paragraph (6) constitutes a deemed consent under the relevant tree preservation order. (9) Any dispute as to a person’s entitlement to compensation under paragraph (7), or as to the amount of compensation, is to be determined under Part 1 (determination of questions of disputed compensation) of the 1961 Act.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
How this law is officially changed
Solon does not know this law's official route yet. The proposal is recorded all the same, and the route appears here once its source is added.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.