Armed Forces Act 2001
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
23 Restriction of judicial review of courts-martial
(1) Section 29 of the Senior Courts Act 1981 (c. 54) (orders of mandamus, prohibition and certiorari) is amended as follows. (2) In subsection (1) at the beginning there is inserted “ Subject to subsection (3A), ”. (3) After subsection (3) there is inserted— (3A) The High Court shall have no jurisdiction to make orders of mandamus, prohibition or certiorari in relation to the jurisdiction of a court-martial in matters relating to— (a) trial by court-martial for an offence, or (b) appeals from a Standing Civilian Court; and in this subsection “court-martial” means a court-martial under the Army Act 1955, the Air Force Act 1955 or the Naval Discipline Act 1957.
23 Restriction of judicial review of courts-martial
(1) Section 29 of the Senior Courts Act 1981 (c. 54) (orders of mandamus, prohibition and certiorari) is amended as follows. (2) In subsection (1) at the beginning there is inserted “ Subject to subsection (3A), ”. (3) After subsection (3) there is inserted— (3A) The High Court shall have no jurisdiction to make orders of mandamus, prohibition or certiorari in relation to the jurisdiction of a court-martial in matters relating to— (a) trial by court-martial for an offence, or (b) appeals from a Standing Civilian Court; and in this subsection “court-martial” means a court-martial under the Army Act 1955, the Air Force Act 1955 or the Naval Discipline Act 1957.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.