Propose a change

Income Tax Act 2007

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

477 Sub-fund elections under Schedule 4ZA to TCGA 1992

(1) This section applies for the purposes of the Income Tax Acts (except so far as, in those Acts, the context otherwise requires) if the trustees of a settlement have made a sub-fund election under paragraph 1 of Schedule 4ZA to TCGA 1992. (2) The sub-fund settlement is treated as a settlement that is created at the relevant time. (3) Each trustee of the trusts on which property comprised in the sub-fund settlement is held is treated as a trustee of the sub-fund settlement. (4) A person (“T”) who is a trustee of the sub-fund settlement is treated, from the relevant time, as having ceased to be a trustee of the principal settlement unless T is also a trustee of trusts on which property comprised in the principal settlement is held. (5) A person (“T”) who is a trustee of the principal settlement is not to be treated as a trustee of the sub-fund settlement unless T is also a trustee of trusts on which property comprised in the sub-fund settlement is held. (6) The trustees of the sub-fund settlement are treated as having become, at the relevant time, absolutely entitled to the property comprised in that settlement as against the trustees of the principal settlement. (7) In this section— “principal settlement” has the meaning given by paragraph 1 of Schedule 4ZA to TCGA 1992, “the relevant time” means the time when the sub-fund election is treated as having taken effect under paragraph 2 of that Schedule, “sub-fund election” has the meaning given by paragraph 2 of that Schedule, and “sub-fund settlement” has the meaning given by paragraph 1 of that Schedule.

Your change, as a redline

477 Sub-fund elections under Schedule 4ZA to TCGA 1992

(1) This section applies for the purposes of the Income Tax Acts (except so far as, in those Acts, the context otherwise requires) if the trustees of a settlement have made a sub-fund election under paragraph 1 of Schedule 4ZA to TCGA 1992. (2) The sub-fund settlement is treated as a settlement that is created at the relevant time. (3) Each trustee of the trusts on which property comprised in the sub-fund settlement is held is treated as a trustee of the sub-fund settlement. (4) A person (“T”) who is a trustee of the sub-fund settlement is treated, from the relevant time, as having ceased to be a trustee of the principal settlement unless T is also a trustee of trusts on which property comprised in the principal settlement is held. (5) A person (“T”) who is a trustee of the principal settlement is not to be treated as a trustee of the sub-fund settlement unless T is also a trustee of trusts on which property comprised in the sub-fund settlement is held. (6) The trustees of the sub-fund settlement are treated as having become, at the relevant time, absolutely entitled to the property comprised in that settlement as against the trustees of the principal settlement. (7) In this section— “principal settlement” has the meaning given by paragraph 1 of Schedule 4ZA to TCGA 1992, “the relevant time” means the time when the sub-fund election is treated as having taken effect under paragraph 2 of that Schedule, “sub-fund election” has the meaning given by paragraph 2 of that Schedule, and “sub-fund settlement” has the meaning given by paragraph 1 of that Schedule.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds