Propose a change

Income Tax Act 2007

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

917A Tax avoidance arrangements

(1) This section applies if and to the extent that— (a) a person (“the payer”) makes an intellectual property royalty payment, (b) the payment is received by a person (“the payee”) who is connected with the payer, and (c) the payment is made under DTA tax avoidance arrangements. (2) Any duty under Chapter 6 or 7 to deduct a sum representing income tax at any rate applies without regard to any double taxation arrangements. (3) Any income tax deducted by virtue of subsection (2) may not be set off under section 967 or 968 of CTA 2010. (4) In this section— “arrangements” (except in the phrase “double taxation arrangements”) includes any agreement, understanding, scheme, transaction or series of transactions, whether or not legally enforceable; “DTA tax avoidance arrangements” means arrangements where, having regard to all the circumstances, it is reasonable to conclude that— the main purpose, or one of the main purposes, of the arrangements was to obtain a tax advantage by virtue of any provisions of a double taxation arrangement, and obtaining that tax advantage is contrary to the object and purpose of those provisions; “intellectual property royalty payment” means a payment referred to in section 906(2)(a) or (3)(a); “receive” means receive— directly or indirectly; by one payment or by a series of payments; “tax advantage” is to be construed in accordance with section 208 of FA 2013. (5) For the purposes of this section the payer is connected with the payee if the participation condition is met as between them. (6) Section 148 of TIOPA 2010 (when the participation condition is met) applies for the purposes of subsection (5) as for the purposes of section 147(1)(b) of that Act, but as if references to the actual provision were to the provision made or imposed between the payer and the payee in respect of the arrangements under which the payment is made.

Your change, as a redline

917A Tax avoidance arrangements

(1) This section applies if and to the extent that— (a) a person (“the payer”) makes an intellectual property royalty payment, (b) the payment is received by a person (“the payee”) who is connected with the payer, and (c) the payment is made under DTA tax avoidance arrangements. (2) Any duty under Chapter 6 or 7 to deduct a sum representing income tax at any rate applies without regard to any double taxation arrangements. (3) Any income tax deducted by virtue of subsection (2) may not be set off under section 967 or 968 of CTA 2010. (4) In this section— “arrangements” (except in the phrase “double taxation arrangements”) includes any agreement, understanding, scheme, transaction or series of transactions, whether or not legally enforceable; “DTA tax avoidance arrangements” means arrangements where, having regard to all the circumstances, it is reasonable to conclude that— the main purpose, or one of the main purposes, of the arrangements was to obtain a tax advantage by virtue of any provisions of a double taxation arrangement, and obtaining that tax advantage is contrary to the object and purpose of those provisions; “intellectual property royalty payment” means a payment referred to in section 906(2)(a) or (3)(a); “receive” means receive— directly or indirectly; by one payment or by a series of payments; “tax advantage” is to be construed in accordance with section 208 of FA 2013. (5) For the purposes of this section the payer is connected with the payee if the participation condition is met as between them. (6) Section 148 of TIOPA 2010 (when the participation condition is met) applies for the purposes of subsection (5) as for the purposes of section 147(1)(b) of that Act, but as if references to the actual provision were to the provision made or imposed between the payer and the payee in respect of the arrangements under which the payment is made.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds