Video Recordings Act 1984
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
14 Supply of video recording containing false indication as to classification.
(1) A person who supplies or offers to supply a video recording containing a video work in respect of which no classification certificate has been issued is guilty of an offence if the video recording or any spool, case or other thing on or in which the recording is kept contains any indication that a classification certificate has been issued in respect of that work unless (a) the video work is an exempted work, or (b) the supply is, or would if it took place be, an exempted supply. (2) It is a defence to a charge of committing an offence under subsection (1) above to prove— (a) that the accused believed on reasonable grounds— (i) that a classification certificate had been issued in respect of the video work concerned (ia) that the video work concerned or, if the video recording contained more than one work to which the charge relates, each of those works was an exempted work,, or (ii) that the supply was, or would if it took place be, an exempted supply by virtue of section 3(4) or (5) of this Act, or (b) that the accused neither knew nor had reasonable grounds to believe that the recording, spool, case or other thing (as the case may be) contained the indication concerned. (3) A person who supplies or offers to supply a video recording containing a video work in respect of which a classification certificate has been issued is guilty of an offence if the video recording or any spool, case or other thing on or in which the recording is kept contains any indication that is false in a material particular of any statement falling within section 7(2) of this Act (including any advice falling within paragraph (a) of that subsection) contained in the certificate, unless (a) the video work is an exempted work, or (b) the supply is, or would if it took place be, an exempted supply. (4) It is a defence to a charge of committing an offence under subsection (3) above to prove— (a) that the accused believed on reasonable grounds— (ai) that the video work concerned or, if the video recording contained more than one work to which the charge relates, each of those works was an exempted work, (i) that the supply was, or would if it took place be, an exempted supply by virtue of section 3(4) or (5) of this Act, or (ii) that the certificate concerned contained the statement indicated, or (b) that the accused neither knew nor had reasonable grounds to believe that the recording, spool, case or other thing (as the case may be) contained the indication concerned. (5) A person guilty of an offence under subsection (1) or (3) above shall be liable, on summary conviction, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding six months or a fine not exceeding level 5 on the standard scale or both.
14 Supply of video recording containing false indication as to classification.
(1) A person who supplies or offers to supply a video recording containing a video work in respect of which no classification certificate has been issued is guilty of an offence if the video recording or any spool, case or other thing on or in which the recording is kept contains any indication that a classification certificate has been issued in respect of that work unless (a) the video work is an exempted work, or (b) the supply is, or would if it took place be, an exempted supply. (2) It is a defence to a charge of committing an offence under subsection (1) above to prove— (a) that the accused believed on reasonable grounds— (i) that a classification certificate had been issued in respect of the video work concerned (ia) that the video work concerned or, if the video recording contained more than one work to which the charge relates, each of those works was an exempted work,, or (ii) that the supply was, or would if it took place be, an exempted supply by virtue of section 3(4) or (5) of this Act, or (b) that the accused neither knew nor had reasonable grounds to believe that the recording, spool, case or other thing (as the case may be) contained the indication concerned. (3) A person who supplies or offers to supply a video recording containing a video work in respect of which a classification certificate has been issued is guilty of an offence if the video recording or any spool, case or other thing on or in which the recording is kept contains any indication that is false in a material particular of any statement falling within section 7(2) of this Act (including any advice falling within paragraph (a) of that subsection) contained in the certificate, unless (a) the video work is an exempted work, or (b) the supply is, or would if it took place be, an exempted supply. (4) It is a defence to a charge of committing an offence under subsection (3) above to prove— (a) that the accused believed on reasonable grounds— (ai) that the video work concerned or, if the video recording contained more than one work to which the charge relates, each of those works was an exempted work, (i) that the supply was, or would if it took place be, an exempted supply by virtue of section 3(4) or (5) of this Act, or (ii) that the certificate concerned contained the statement indicated, or (b) that the accused neither knew nor had reasonable grounds to believe that the recording, spool, case or other thing (as the case may be) contained the indication concerned. (5) A person guilty of an offence under subsection (1) or (3) above shall be liable, on summary conviction, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding six months or a fine not exceeding level 5 on the standard scale or both.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.