Public Service Pensions and Judicial Offices Act 2022
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
As published
32 Whether an “immediate detriment remedy” has been obtained
(1) For the purposes of section 31 an “immediate detriment remedy” has been obtained in relation to a person’s remediable service in an employment or office if either of the following conditions is met.
(2) The first condition is that—
(a) a court or tribunal has determined that, as a result of a non-discrimination rule, any person has any rights under a Chapter 1 scheme in respect of the remediable service, and
(b) the scheme manager of the scheme has—
(i) paid any benefits or compensation in accordance with the determination, or
(ii) taken any other step (for example, altering records) to implement the determination.
(3) The second condition is that—
(a) the scheme manager of a Chapter 1 scheme and any person have agreed that, as a result of a non-discrimination rule, the person has any rights under a Chapter 1 scheme in respect of the remediable service, and
(b) the scheme manager of the scheme has—
(i) paid any benefits or compensation in accordance with the agreement, or
(ii) taken any other step (for example, altering records) to implement the agreement.
(4) In this section “non-discrimination rule” means a rule that is, or at any time was, included in a Chapter 1 scheme by virtue of—
(a) section 61 of EA 2010, or
(b) paragraph 2 of Schedule 1 to EEAR(NI) 2006.
Your change, as a redline
32 Whether an “immediate detriment remedy” has been obtained
(1) For the purposes of section 31 an “immediate detriment remedy” has been obtained in relation to a person’s remediable service in an employment or office if either of the following conditions is met.
(2) The first condition is that—
(a) a court or tribunal has determined that, as a result of a non-discrimination rule, any person has any rights under a Chapter 1 scheme in respect of the remediable service, and
(b) the scheme manager of the scheme has—
(i) paid any benefits or compensation in accordance with the determination, or
(ii) taken any other step (for example, altering records) to implement the determination.
(3) The second condition is that—
(a) the scheme manager of a Chapter 1 scheme and any person have agreed that, as a result of a non-discrimination rule, the person has any rights under a Chapter 1 scheme in respect of the remediable service, and
(b) the scheme manager of the scheme has—
(i) paid any benefits or compensation in accordance with the agreement, or
(ii) taken any other step (for example, altering records) to implement the agreement.
(4) In this section “non-discrimination rule” means a rule that is, or at any time was, included in a Chapter 1 scheme by virtue of—
(a) section 61 of EA 2010, or
(b) paragraph 2 of Schedule 1 to EEAR(NI) 2006.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.