Public Service Pensions and Judicial Offices Act 2022
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
As published
64 Information statements
(1) The relevant authority must—
(a) prepare a statement in relation to any person (“P”) in respect of whom a legacy scheme election or a 2015 election may be made, and
(b) send it to the person who may make the election (see section 46).
(2) Subsection (1) must be complied with before the beginning of the election period in relation to P.
(3) The statement must contain—
(a) a description of the benefits that would be available in respect of P’s remediable service if a legacy scheme election were made in respect of P (specifying the judicial legacy scheme or schemes under which those benefits would be available),
(b) if a 2015 scheme election may be made in respect of P, a description of the benefits that would be available in respect of P’s remediable service if the election were made (specifying the judicial 2015 scheme or schemes under which those benefits would be available),
(c) a description of the benefits (if any) that would be available in respect of P’s remediable service if no legacy scheme election or 2015 scheme election is made in respect of P (specifying the judicial scheme or schemes under which any benefits would be available),
(d) a description of—
(i) the arrangements (if any) that, by virtue of section 60 (remedial arrangements to pay voluntary contributions to judicial schemes), may be entered into under judicial schemes, and
(ii) the circumstances in which, and the process by which, such arrangements may be entered into, and
(e) such other information as the relevant authority considers relevant to the decision as to whether to make a legacy scheme election or 2015 scheme election in respect of P.
Your change, as a redline
64 Information statements
(1) The relevant authority must—
(a) prepare a statement in relation to any person (“P”) in respect of whom a legacy scheme election or a 2015 election may be made, and
(b) send it to the person who may make the election (see section 46).
(2) Subsection (1) must be complied with before the beginning of the election period in relation to P.
(3) The statement must contain—
(a) a description of the benefits that would be available in respect of P’s remediable service if a legacy scheme election were made in respect of P (specifying the judicial legacy scheme or schemes under which those benefits would be available),
(b) if a 2015 scheme election may be made in respect of P, a description of the benefits that would be available in respect of P’s remediable service if the election were made (specifying the judicial 2015 scheme or schemes under which those benefits would be available),
(c) a description of the benefits (if any) that would be available in respect of P’s remediable service if no legacy scheme election or 2015 scheme election is made in respect of P (specifying the judicial scheme or schemes under which any benefits would be available),
(d) a description of—
(i) the arrangements (if any) that, by virtue of section 60 (remedial arrangements to pay voluntary contributions to judicial schemes), may be entered into under judicial schemes, and
(ii) the circumstances in which, and the process by which, such arrangements may be entered into, and
(e) such other information as the relevant authority considers relevant to the decision as to whether to make a legacy scheme election or 2015 scheme election in respect of P.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.