Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
As published
19 Decision as to allocation
(1) The court shall decide whether the offence appears to it more suitable for summary trial or for trial on indictment.
(2) Before making a decision under this section, the court—
(a) shall give the prosecution an opportunity to inform the court of the accused’s previous convictions (if any); and
(b) shall give the prosecution and the accused an opportunity to make representations as to whether summary trial or trial on indictment would be more suitable.
(3) In making a decision under this section, the court shall consider—
(a) whether the sentence which a magistrates' court would have power to impose for the offence would be adequate; and
(b) any representations made by the prosecution or the accused under subsection (2)(b) above,
and shall have regard to any allocation guidelines (or revised allocation guidelines) issued as definitive guidelines under section 170 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003.
(4) Where—
(a) the accused is charged with two or more offences; and
(b) it appears to the court that the charges for the offences could be joined in the same indictment or that the offences arise out of the same or connected circumstances,
subsection (3)(a) above shall have effect as if references to the sentence which a magistrates' court would have power to impose for the offence were a reference to the maximum aggregate sentence which a magistrates' court would have power to impose for all of the offences taken together.
(5) In this section any reference to a previous conviction is a reference to—
(a) a previous conviction by a court in the United Kingdom; ... or
(aa) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(b) a previous finding of guilt in—
(i) any proceedings under the Army Act 1955, the Air Force Act 1955 or the Naval Discipline Act 1957 (whether before a court-martial or any other court or person authorised under any of those Acts to award a punishment in respect of any offence); or
(ii) any proceedings before a Standing Civilian Court.
(5A) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(6) If, in respect of the offence, the court receives a notice under section 51B or 51C of the Crime and Disorder Act 1998 (which relate to serious or complex fraud cases and to certain cases involving children respectively), the preceding provisions of this section and sections 20, 20A and 21 below shall not apply, and the court shall proceed in relation to the offence in accordance with section 51(1) of that Act.
Your change, as a redline
19 Decision as to allocation
(1) The court shall decide whether the offence appears to it more suitable for summary trial or for trial on indictment.
(2) Before making a decision under this section, the court—
(a) shall give the prosecution an opportunity to inform the court of the accused’s previous convictions (if any); and
(b) shall give the prosecution and the accused an opportunity to make representations as to whether summary trial or trial on indictment would be more suitable.
(3) In making a decision under this section, the court shall consider—
(a) whether the sentence which a magistrates' court would have power to impose for the offence would be adequate; and
(b) any representations made by the prosecution or the accused under subsection (2)(b) above,
and shall have regard to any allocation guidelines (or revised allocation guidelines) issued as definitive guidelines under section 170 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003.
(4) Where—
(a) the accused is charged with two or more offences; and
(b) it appears to the court that the charges for the offences could be joined in the same indictment or that the offences arise out of the same or connected circumstances,
subsection (3)(a) above shall have effect as if references to the sentence which a magistrates' court would have power to impose for the offence were a reference to the maximum aggregate sentence which a magistrates' court would have power to impose for all of the offences taken together.
(5) In this section any reference to a previous conviction is a reference to—
(a) a previous conviction by a court in the United Kingdom; ... or
(aa) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(b) a previous finding of guilt in—
(i) any proceedings under the Army Act 1955, the Air Force Act 1955 or the Naval Discipline Act 1957 (whether before a court-martial or any other court or person authorised under any of those Acts to award a punishment in respect of any offence); or
(ii) any proceedings before a Standing Civilian Court.
(5A) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(6) If, in respect of the offence, the court receives a notice under section 51B or 51C of the Crime and Disorder Act 1998 (which relate to serious or complex fraud cases and to certain cases involving children respectively), the preceding provisions of this section and sections 20, 20A and 21 below shall not apply, and the court shall proceed in relation to the offence in accordance with section 51(1) of that Act.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.