Propose a change

Magistrates’ Courts Act 1980

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

87A Fines imposed on companies.

(1) Where— (a) a magistrates’ court has, or is treated by any enactment as having, adjudged a company by a conviction to pay a sum; and (b) the court has issued a warrant of control under section 76(1) above for the purpose of levying the sum; and (c) it appears on the return to the warrant that the company's money and goods are insufficient to pay the amount outstanding, the designated officer for the court may make an application in relation to the company under section 124 of, or paragraph 12 of Schedule B1 to, the Insolvency Act 1986 (administration or winding up). (2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (3) In this section, “the amount outstanding” has the meaning given by paragraph 50(3) of Schedule 12 to the Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007.

Your change, as a redline

87A Fines imposed on companies.

(1) Where— (a) a magistrates’ court has, or is treated by any enactment as having, adjudged a company by a conviction to pay a sum; and (b) the court has issued a warrant of control under section 76(1) above for the purpose of levying the sum; and (c) it appears on the return to the warrant that the company's money and goods are insufficient to pay the amount outstanding, the designated officer for the court may make an application in relation to the company under section 124 of, or paragraph 12 of Schedule B1 to, the Insolvency Act 1986 (administration or winding up). (2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (3) In this section, “the amount outstanding” has the meaning given by paragraph 50(3) of Schedule 12 to the Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds