Agricultural Statistics Act 1979
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
SCHEDULE 1 Consequential Amendments
Section 7. Agricultural Marketing Act 1958 1 In section 5(4) of the Agricultural Marketing Act 1958 (list of producers) for the words “eighty of the Agriculture Act 1947” there shall be substituted the words “three of the Agricultural Statistics Act 1979”. Public Records Act 1958 2 At the end of Schedule 2 to the Public Records Act 1958 (enactments prohibiting disclosure of information obtained from the public) there shall be added— “ The Agricultural Statistics Act 1979 Section 3. ” 3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... 4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
SCHEDULE 1 Consequential Amendments
Section 7. Agricultural Marketing Act 1958 1 In section 5(4) of the Agricultural Marketing Act 1958 (list of producers) for the words “eighty of the Agriculture Act 1947” there shall be substituted the words “three of the Agricultural Statistics Act 1979”. Public Records Act 1958 2 At the end of Schedule 2 to the Public Records Act 1958 (enactments prohibiting disclosure of information obtained from the public) there shall be added— “ The Agricultural Statistics Act 1979 Section 3. ” 3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... 4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.