Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
As published
26 Injunctions restraining breaches of section 17(1)
(A1) Where the OGA considers it necessary or expedient to restrain any actual or apprehended breach of section 17(1) in relation to an English controlled place, the OGA may apply to the High Court for an injunction.
(A2) Where the Welsh Ministers consider it necessary or expedient to restrain any actual or apprehended breach of section 17(1) in relation to a Welsh controlled place, they may apply to the High Court for an injunction.
(1) Where the Scottish Ministers consider it necessary or expedient to restrain any actual or apprehended breach of section 17(1) in relation to a controlled place in, under or over the territorial sea adjacent to ScotlandScottish controlled place, they may apply to the Court of Session for an interdict.
(1A) Where the Department of Enterprise, Trade and Investment in Northern Ireland considers it necessary or expedient to restrain any actual or apprehended breach of section 17(1) in relation to a Northern Ireland controlled place, it may apply to the High Court for an injunction.
(2) Where the OGA considers it necessary or expedient to restrain any ...actual or apprehended breach of section 17(1) in relation to an offshore UK-controlled place, the OGA may apply—
(a) to the High Court for an injunction, or
(b) to the Court of Session for an interdict.
(3) An application may be made under this section whether or not the applicant has exercised or is proposing to exercise any of the other powers under this Chapter.
(4) On an application under this section, the Court of Session may grant such an interdict, or the High Court may grant such an injunction, as it thinks appropriate for the purpose of restraining the breach.
(5) Rules of court may provide for an injunction or interdict to be issued against a person whose identity is unknown.
Your change, as a redline
26 Injunctions restraining breaches of section 17(1)
(A1) Where the OGA considers it necessary or expedient to restrain any actual or apprehended breach of section 17(1) in relation to an English controlled place, the OGA may apply to the High Court for an injunction.
(A2) Where the Welsh Ministers consider it necessary or expedient to restrain any actual or apprehended breach of section 17(1) in relation to a Welsh controlled place, they may apply to the High Court for an injunction.
(1) Where the Scottish Ministers consider it necessary or expedient to restrain any actual or apprehended breach of section 17(1) in relation to a controlled place in, under or over the territorial sea adjacent to ScotlandScottish controlled place, they may apply to the Court of Session for an interdict.
(1A) Where the Department of Enterprise, Trade and Investment in Northern Ireland considers it necessary or expedient to restrain any actual or apprehended breach of section 17(1) in relation to a Northern Ireland controlled place, it may apply to the High Court for an injunction.
(2) Where the OGA considers it necessary or expedient to restrain any ...actual or apprehended breach of section 17(1) in relation to an offshore UK-controlled place, the OGA may apply—
(a) to the High Court for an injunction, or
(b) to the Court of Session for an interdict.
(3) An application may be made under this section whether or not the applicant has exercised or is proposing to exercise any of the other powers under this Chapter.
(4) On an application under this section, the Court of Session may grant such an interdict, or the High Court may grant such an injunction, as it thinks appropriate for the purpose of restraining the breach.
(5) Rules of court may provide for an injunction or interdict to be issued against a person whose identity is unknown.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.