Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
As published
18 Rights to preside and size of bench
(1) If the chairman for a local justice area is present at a sitting or other meeting of lay justices assigned to or acting in the area, he must preside.
(2) If, in the absence of the chairman, one or more of the deputy chairmen for a local justice area is present at a sitting or other meeting of lay justices assigned to or acting in that area he (or the most senior of them) must preside.
(3) Neither subsection (1) nor subsection (2) applies if, in accordance with rules, the chairman or (as the case may be) the deputy chairman asks another of the lay justices to preside.
(4) Subsections (1) and (2) do not confer on the chairman or a deputy chairman a right to preside in court if, under rules, he is ineligible to do so.
(5) Subsections (1) and (2) do not confer on the chairman or a deputy chairman a right to preside—
(a) in a youth court ...,
(b) at meetings of a committee or other body of justices of the peace which has its own chairman, or
(c) at sittings when a District Judge (Magistrates' Courts) is engaged as such in administering justice.
(6) Rules may make provision for the purposes of subsections (3) and (4) and may in particular make provision—
(a) as to training courses to be completed by lay justices before they may preside in court,
(b) as to—
(i) the approval of lay justices, in accordance with the rules, before they may preside in court,
(ii) the lay justices who may be so approved, and
(iii) the courts to which the approval relates, and
(c) as to circumstances in which a lay justice may preside in court even though requirements imposed under paragraph (a) or (b) are not met in relation to him.
(7) Rules may also make provision—
(a) specifying the maximum number of lay justices who may sit to deal with a case as a magistrates' court, and
(b) as to the arrangements to be made for securing the presence on the bench of enough, but not more than enough, lay justices.
Your change, as a redline
18 Rights to preside and size of bench
(1) If the chairman for a local justice area is present at a sitting or other meeting of lay justices assigned to or acting in the area, he must preside.
(2) If, in the absence of the chairman, one or more of the deputy chairmen for a local justice area is present at a sitting or other meeting of lay justices assigned to or acting in that area he (or the most senior of them) must preside.
(3) Neither subsection (1) nor subsection (2) applies if, in accordance with rules, the chairman or (as the case may be) the deputy chairman asks another of the lay justices to preside.
(4) Subsections (1) and (2) do not confer on the chairman or a deputy chairman a right to preside in court if, under rules, he is ineligible to do so.
(5) Subsections (1) and (2) do not confer on the chairman or a deputy chairman a right to preside—
(a) in a youth court ...,
(b) at meetings of a committee or other body of justices of the peace which has its own chairman, or
(c) at sittings when a District Judge (Magistrates' Courts) is engaged as such in administering justice.
(6) Rules may make provision for the purposes of subsections (3) and (4) and may in particular make provision—
(a) as to training courses to be completed by lay justices before they may preside in court,
(b) as to—
(i) the approval of lay justices, in accordance with the rules, before they may preside in court,
(ii) the lay justices who may be so approved, and
(iii) the courts to which the approval relates, and
(c) as to circumstances in which a lay justice may preside in court even though requirements imposed under paragraph (a) or (b) are not met in relation to him.
(7) Rules may also make provision—
(a) specifying the maximum number of lay justices who may sit to deal with a case as a magistrates' court, and
(b) as to the arrangements to be made for securing the presence on the bench of enough, but not more than enough, lay justices.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.