Courts Act 2003
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
67C Exercise of relevant judicial functions: reconsideration of decisions
(1) Before making rules of court that provide for the exercise of relevant judicial functions by authorised persons by virtue of section 67B(1), the authority with power to make the rules must take the following steps in relation to each of the functions in question. (2) The authority must consider whether the rules should include a right for the parties to proceedings in which a decision is made by an authorised person exercising the function to have the decision reconsidered by a judicial office holder. (3) If the authority considers that the rules should include such a right, it must include provision to that effect when it makes the rules. (4) If the authority does not consider that the rules should include such a right, it must inform the Lord Chancellor of— (a) its decision, and (b) its reasons for reaching that decision.
67C Exercise of relevant judicial functions: reconsideration of decisions
(1) Before making rules of court that provide for the exercise of relevant judicial functions by authorised persons by virtue of section 67B(1), the authority with power to make the rules must take the following steps in relation to each of the functions in question. (2) The authority must consider whether the rules should include a right for the parties to proceedings in which a decision is made by an authorised person exercising the function to have the decision reconsidered by a judicial office holder. (3) If the authority considers that the rules should include such a right, it must include provision to that effect when it makes the rules. (4) If the authority does not consider that the rules should include such a right, it must inform the Lord Chancellor of— (a) its decision, and (b) its reasons for reaching that decision.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.