Courts Act 2003
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
91 Extension of time for appeals from Courts-Martial Appeal Court
(1) Amend section 40 of the Courts-Martial (Appeals) Act 1968 (c. 20) (applications for leave to appeal to Supreme Court) as follows. (2) In subsection (1)— (a) for “fourteen” (in both places) substitute “ 28 ”, and (b) for “date of the decision of the Appeal Court” substitute “ relevant date ”. (3) After subsection (1) insert— (1A) In subsection (1), “the relevant date” means— (a) the date of the Appeal Court’s decision, or (b) if later, the date on which the Appeal Court gives reasons for its decision.
91 Extension of time for appeals from Courts-Martial Appeal Court
(1) Amend section 40 of the Courts-Martial (Appeals) Act 1968 (c. 20) (applications for leave to appeal to Supreme Court) as follows. (2) In subsection (1)— (a) for “fourteen” (in both places) substitute “ 28 ”, and (b) for “date of the decision of the Appeal Court” substitute “ relevant date ”. (3) After subsection (1) insert— (1A) In subsection (1), “the relevant date” means— (a) the date of the Appeal Court’s decision, or (b) if later, the date on which the Appeal Court gives reasons for its decision.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.