The Community Legal Service (Funding) (Counsel in Family Proceedings) (Amendment) Order 2014
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
2 Amendments to the Community Legal Service (Funding) (Counsel in Family Proceedings) Order 2001
(1) The Community Legal Service (Funding) (Counsel in Family Proceedings) Order 2001 is amended as follows. (2) In article 2(1)— (a) for the definition of “Case Management Conference”, substitute— “Case Management Hearing” means a Case Management Conference held in accordance with step 4 of the Children Act Protocol or a Case Management Conference or Case Management Hearing held in accordance with stage 2 of the applicable Public Law Outline; ; (b) after the definition of “Issues Resolution Hearing”, insert— “judge of High Court judge level” means— a deputy judge of the High Court; a puisne judge of the High Court; a person who has been— a judge of the Court of Appeal; or a puisne judge of the High Court, who may act as a judge of the family court by virtue of section 9 of the Senior Courts Act 1981; the Senior President of Tribunals; the Chancellor of the High Court; an ordinary judge of the Court of Appeal (including the vice-president, if any, of either division of that court); the President of the Queen’s Bench Division; the President of the Family Division; the Master of the Rolls; or the Lord Chief Justice; ; and (c) in the definition of “Public Law Outline”, for the words from “table” to the end, substitute “Practice Direction applicable to the proceedings;”. (3) In articles 2C, 8 and 9, for “Case Management Conference”, in each place those words appear, substitute “Case Management Hearing”. (4) In article 4(2), for “High Court, county courts and magistrates’ courts”, substitute “High Court or family court”. (5) In article 5(2), for “in the High Court”, substitute “before a judge of High Court judge level”. (6) In article 15(2), omit “from a District Judge to a Circuit Judge or a High Court Judge,”.
2 Amendments to the Community Legal Service (Funding) (Counsel in Family Proceedings) Order 2001
(1) The Community Legal Service (Funding) (Counsel in Family Proceedings) Order 2001 is amended as follows. (2) In article 2(1)— (a) for the definition of “Case Management Conference”, substitute— “Case Management Hearing” means a Case Management Conference held in accordance with step 4 of the Children Act Protocol or a Case Management Conference or Case Management Hearing held in accordance with stage 2 of the applicable Public Law Outline; ; (b) after the definition of “Issues Resolution Hearing”, insert— “judge of High Court judge level” means— a deputy judge of the High Court; a puisne judge of the High Court; a person who has been— a judge of the Court of Appeal; or a puisne judge of the High Court, who may act as a judge of the family court by virtue of section 9 of the Senior Courts Act 1981; the Senior President of Tribunals; the Chancellor of the High Court; an ordinary judge of the Court of Appeal (including the vice-president, if any, of either division of that court); the President of the Queen’s Bench Division; the President of the Family Division; the Master of the Rolls; or the Lord Chief Justice; ; and (c) in the definition of “Public Law Outline”, for the words from “table” to the end, substitute “Practice Direction applicable to the proceedings;”. (3) In articles 2C, 8 and 9, for “Case Management Conference”, in each place those words appear, substitute “Case Management Hearing”. (4) In article 4(2), for “High Court, county courts and magistrates’ courts”, substitute “High Court or family court”. (5) In article 5(2), for “in the High Court”, substitute “before a judge of High Court judge level”. (6) In article 15(2), omit “from a District Judge to a Circuit Judge or a High Court Judge,”.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
How this law is officially changed
Solon does not know this law's official route yet. The proposal is recorded all the same, and the route appears here once its source is added.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.