The British Transport Police (Barred List and Advisory List) Regulations 2026
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
3 Information to be included in the barred list
(1) The Authority must include in the barred list the following information in relation to each person (“P”) included in the list— (a) P’s full name; (b) P’s date of birth; (c) whether at the time of the relevant dismissal or relevant finding by virtue of which P was included in the list, P was a constable, a former constable, a civilian employee or a former civilian employee; (d) where P was a constable at the time of the relevant dismissal— (i) P’s rank at that time, and (ii) any number used at that time to identify P as a constable, for example, a warrant number; (e) where P was a former constable at the time of the relevant finding— (i) P’s rank when P was last a constable, and (ii) any number used when P was last a constable to identify P as such, for example, a warrant number; (f) where P was a civilian employee at the time of the relevant dismissal, any number used at that time to identify P as such an employee; (g) where P was a former civilian employee at the time of the relevant finding, any number used when P was last a civilian employee to identify P as such; (h) the reasons for the relevant dismissal or the relevant finding, including where applicable— (i) a description of P’s conduct which led to the relevant dismissal or the relevant finding, and (ii) any provision of the Standards of Professional Behaviour breached by P; (i) the date of the relevant dismissal or the relevant finding; (j) the date P’s details are included in the barred list. (2) In this regulation, “Standards of Professional Behaviour” has the meaning given in the Police (Conduct) Regulations 2020.
3 Information to be included in the barred list
(1) The Authority must include in the barred list the following information in relation to each person (“P”) included in the list— (a) P’s full name; (b) P’s date of birth; (c) whether at the time of the relevant dismissal or relevant finding by virtue of which P was included in the list, P was a constable, a former constable, a civilian employee or a former civilian employee; (d) where P was a constable at the time of the relevant dismissal— (i) P’s rank at that time, and (ii) any number used at that time to identify P as a constable, for example, a warrant number; (e) where P was a former constable at the time of the relevant finding— (i) P’s rank when P was last a constable, and (ii) any number used when P was last a constable to identify P as such, for example, a warrant number; (f) where P was a civilian employee at the time of the relevant dismissal, any number used at that time to identify P as such an employee; (g) where P was a former civilian employee at the time of the relevant finding, any number used when P was last a civilian employee to identify P as such; (h) the reasons for the relevant dismissal or the relevant finding, including where applicable— (i) a description of P’s conduct which led to the relevant dismissal or the relevant finding, and (ii) any provision of the Standards of Professional Behaviour breached by P; (i) the date of the relevant dismissal or the relevant finding; (j) the date P’s details are included in the barred list. (2) In this regulation, “Standards of Professional Behaviour” has the meaning given in the Police (Conduct) Regulations 2020.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.