Propose a change

The Non-Contentious Probate (Amendment) Rules 2025

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

5 Amendments to rule 27 (grants where two or more persons entitled in the same degree)

In rule 27— (a) after paragraph (6), insert— (6A) In resolving a dispute between persons entitled to a grant of administration in the same degree, the district judge or registrar may apply the following order of priority, namely— (a) the person with the support of the majority of those entitled in the same degree; (b) of the persons entitled in the same degree, the person who first lodges an application with the registry; (c) a neutral person agreed by the parties to the dispute; (d) a neutral person appointed by the registry in accordance with directions. ; (b) after paragraph (8), insert— (9) In paragraph (6A), “a neutral person” means any person not entitled to a grant of administration in the same degree as the parties in dispute. .

Your change, as a redline

5 Amendments to rule 27 (grants where two or more persons entitled in the same degree)

In rule 27— (a) after paragraph (6), insert— (6A) In resolving a dispute between persons entitled to a grant of administration in the same degree, the district judge or registrar may apply the following order of priority, namely— (a) the person with the support of the majority of those entitled in the same degree; (b) of the persons entitled in the same degree, the person who first lodges an application with the registry; (c) a neutral person agreed by the parties to the dispute; (d) a neutral person appointed by the registry in accordance with directions. ; (b) after paragraph (8), insert— (9) In paragraph (6A), “a neutral person” means any person not entitled to a grant of administration in the same degree as the parties in dispute. .

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

How this law is officially changed

Solon does not know this law's official route yet. The proposal is recorded all the same, and the route appears here once its source is added.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds