Propose a change

Water Resources Act 1991

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

163 Discharges for works purposes.

(1) Subject to the following provisions of this section and to section 164 below, where the appropriate agency— (a) is carrying out, or is about to carry out, the construction, alteration, repair, cleaning, or examination of any reservoir, well, borehole or other work belonging to or used by the appropriate agency for the purposes of, or in connection with, the carrying out of any of its functions; or (b) is exercising or about to exercise any power conferred by section 159, 160 or 162(2) or (3) above, the appropriate agency may cause the water in any relevant pipe or in any such reservoir, well, borehole or other work to be discharged into any available watercourse. (2) Nothing in this section shall authorise any discharge which— (a) damages or injuriously affects the works or property of any railway company or navigation authority; or (b) floods or damages any highway. (3) If the appropriate agency fails to take all necessary steps to secure that any water discharged by it under this section is as free as may be reasonably practicable from— (a) mud and silt; (b) solid, polluting, offensive or injurious substances; and (c) any substances prejudicial to fish or spawn, or to spawning beds or food of fish, it shall be guilty of an offence and liable, on summary conviction, to a fine not exceeding level 3 on the standard scale. (4) In this section— “railway company” means the British Railways Board, Transport for London or any subsidiary (within the meaning of the Greater London Authority Act 1999) of Transport for London, or any other person authorised by any enactment, or by any order, rule or regulation made under any enactment, to construct, work or carry on a railway; and “relevant pipe” has the same meaning as in section 159 above.

Your change, as a redline

163 Discharges for works purposes.

(1) Subject to the following provisions of this section and to section 164 below, where the appropriate agency— (a) is carrying out, or is about to carry out, the construction, alteration, repair, cleaning, or examination of any reservoir, well, borehole or other work belonging to or used by the appropriate agency for the purposes of, or in connection with, the carrying out of any of its functions; or (b) is exercising or about to exercise any power conferred by section 159, 160 or 162(2) or (3) above, the appropriate agency may cause the water in any relevant pipe or in any such reservoir, well, borehole or other work to be discharged into any available watercourse. (2) Nothing in this section shall authorise any discharge which— (a) damages or injuriously affects the works or property of any railway company or navigation authority; or (b) floods or damages any highway. (3) If the appropriate agency fails to take all necessary steps to secure that any water discharged by it under this section is as free as may be reasonably practicable from— (a) mud and silt; (b) solid, polluting, offensive or injurious substances; and (c) any substances prejudicial to fish or spawn, or to spawning beds or food of fish, it shall be guilty of an offence and liable, on summary conviction, to a fine not exceeding level 3 on the standard scale. (4) In this section— “railway company” means the British Railways Board, Transport for London or any subsidiary (within the meaning of the Greater London Authority Act 1999) of Transport for London, or any other person authorised by any enactment, or by any order, rule or regulation made under any enactment, to construct, work or carry on a railway; and “relevant pipe” has the same meaning as in section 159 above.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds