Propose a change

Justice and Security Act 2013

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

14 Sections 6 to 13: interpretation

(1) In sections 6 to 13 and this section— “enactment” means an enactment whenever passed or made and includes— an enactment contained in this Act, an enactment contained in subordinate legislation within the meaning of the Interpretation Act 1978, an enactment contained in, or in an instrument made under, an Act of the Scottish Parliament, an enactment contained in, or in an instrument made under, Northern Ireland legislation, and an enactment contained in, or in an instrument made under, a Measure or Act of the National Assembly for Wales, “the Human Rights Convention” means the Convention within the meaning of the Human Rights Act 1998 (see section 21(1) of that Act), “relevant civil proceedings” has the meaning given by section 6(11), “relevant person” has the meaning given by section 6(8) and includes any person treated as a relevant person by any enactment, “Secretary of State” includes the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster, “section 6 proceedings” has the meaning given by section 8(1) and includes any proceedings treated as section 6 proceedings by any enactment, “sensitive material” has the meaning given by section 6(11), “special advocate” has the meaning given by section 9(2), and references to a party's legal representative do not include a person appointed as a special advocate. (2) Nothing in sections 6 to 13 and this section (or in any provision made by virtue of them)— (a) restricts the power to make rules of court or the matters to be taken into account when doing so, (b) affects the common law rules as to the withholding, on grounds of public interest immunity, of any material in any proceedings, or (c) is to be read as requiring a court or tribunal to act in a manner inconsistent with Article 6 of the Human Rights Convention.

Your change, as a redline

14 Sections 6 to 13: interpretation

(1) In sections 6 to 13 and this section— “enactment” means an enactment whenever passed or made and includes— an enactment contained in this Act, an enactment contained in subordinate legislation within the meaning of the Interpretation Act 1978, an enactment contained in, or in an instrument made under, an Act of the Scottish Parliament, an enactment contained in, or in an instrument made under, Northern Ireland legislation, and an enactment contained in, or in an instrument made under, a Measure or Act of the National Assembly for Wales, “the Human Rights Convention” means the Convention within the meaning of the Human Rights Act 1998 (see section 21(1) of that Act), “relevant civil proceedings” has the meaning given by section 6(11), “relevant person” has the meaning given by section 6(8) and includes any person treated as a relevant person by any enactment, “Secretary of State” includes the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster, “section 6 proceedings” has the meaning given by section 8(1) and includes any proceedings treated as section 6 proceedings by any enactment, “sensitive material” has the meaning given by section 6(11), “special advocate” has the meaning given by section 9(2), and references to a party's legal representative do not include a person appointed as a special advocate. (2) Nothing in sections 6 to 13 and this section (or in any provision made by virtue of them)— (a) restricts the power to make rules of court or the matters to be taken into account when doing so, (b) affects the common law rules as to the withholding, on grounds of public interest immunity, of any material in any proceedings, or (c) is to be read as requiring a court or tribunal to act in a manner inconsistent with Article 6 of the Human Rights Convention.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds