Propose a change

Justice and Security Act 2013

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

6 Declaration permitting closed material applications in proceedings

(1) The court seised of relevant civil proceedings may make a declaration that the proceedings are proceedings in which a closed material application may be made to the court. (2) The court may make such a declaration— (a) on the application of— (i) the Secretary of State (whether or not the Secretary of State is a party to the proceedings), or (ii) any party to the proceedings, or (b) of its own motion. (3) The court may make such a declaration if it considers that the following two conditions are met. (4) The first condition is that— (a) a party to the proceedings would be required to disclose sensitive material in the course of the proceedings to another person (whether or not another party to the proceedings), or (b) a party to the proceedings would be required to make such a disclosure were it not for one or more of the following— (i) the possibility of a claim for public interest immunity in relation to the material, (ii) the fact that there would be no requirement to disclose if the party chose not to rely on the material, (iii) section 56(1) of the Investigatory Powers Act 2016 (exclusion for intercept material), (iv) any other enactment that would prevent the party from disclosing the material but would not do so if the proceedings were proceedings in relation to which there was a declaration under this section. (5) The second condition is that it is in the interests of the fair and effective administration of justice in the proceedings to make a declaration. (6) The two conditions are met if the court considers that they are met in relation to any material that would be required to be disclosed in the course of the proceedings (and an application under subsection (2)(a) need not be based on all of the material that might meet the conditions or on material that the applicant would be required to disclose). (7) The court must not consider an application by the Secretary of State under subsection (2)(a) unless it is satisfied that the Secretary of State has, before making the application, considered whether to make, or advise another person to make, a claim for public interest immunity in relation to the material on which the application is based. (8) A declaration under this section must identify the party or parties to the proceedings who would be required to disclose the sensitive material (“a relevant person”). (9) Rules of court may— (a) provide for notification to the Secretary of State by a party to relevant civil proceedings, or by the court concerned, of proceedings to which a declaration under this section may be relevant, (b) provide for a stay or sist of relevant civil proceedings (whether on an application by a party to the proceedings or by the court concerned of its own motion) where a person is considering whether to apply for a declaration under this section, (c) provide for the Secretary of State, if not a party to proceedings in relation to which there is a declaration under this section or proceedings for or about such a declaration, to be joined as a party to the proceedings. (10) Rules of court must make provision— (a) requiring a person, before making an application under subsection (2)(a), to give notice of the person's intention to make an application to every other person entitled to make such an application in relation to the relevant civil proceedings, (b) requiring the applicant to inform every other such person of the outcome of the application. (11) In this section— “closed material application” means an application of the kind mentioned in section 8(1)(a), “relevant civil proceedings” means any proceedings (other than proceedings in a criminal cause or matter) before— the High Court, the Court of Appeal, the Court of Session, or the Supreme Court, “sensitive material” means material the disclosure of which would be damaging to the interests of national security.

Your change, as a redline

6 Declaration permitting closed material applications in proceedings

(1) The court seised of relevant civil proceedings may make a declaration that the proceedings are proceedings in which a closed material application may be made to the court. (2) The court may make such a declaration— (a) on the application of— (i) the Secretary of State (whether or not the Secretary of State is a party to the proceedings), or (ii) any party to the proceedings, or (b) of its own motion. (3) The court may make such a declaration if it considers that the following two conditions are met. (4) The first condition is that— (a) a party to the proceedings would be required to disclose sensitive material in the course of the proceedings to another person (whether or not another party to the proceedings), or (b) a party to the proceedings would be required to make such a disclosure were it not for one or more of the following— (i) the possibility of a claim for public interest immunity in relation to the material, (ii) the fact that there would be no requirement to disclose if the party chose not to rely on the material, (iii) section 56(1) of the Investigatory Powers Act 2016 (exclusion for intercept material), (iv) any other enactment that would prevent the party from disclosing the material but would not do so if the proceedings were proceedings in relation to which there was a declaration under this section. (5) The second condition is that it is in the interests of the fair and effective administration of justice in the proceedings to make a declaration. (6) The two conditions are met if the court considers that they are met in relation to any material that would be required to be disclosed in the course of the proceedings (and an application under subsection (2)(a) need not be based on all of the material that might meet the conditions or on material that the applicant would be required to disclose). (7) The court must not consider an application by the Secretary of State under subsection (2)(a) unless it is satisfied that the Secretary of State has, before making the application, considered whether to make, or advise another person to make, a claim for public interest immunity in relation to the material on which the application is based. (8) A declaration under this section must identify the party or parties to the proceedings who would be required to disclose the sensitive material (“a relevant person”). (9) Rules of court may— (a) provide for notification to the Secretary of State by a party to relevant civil proceedings, or by the court concerned, of proceedings to which a declaration under this section may be relevant, (b) provide for a stay or sist of relevant civil proceedings (whether on an application by a party to the proceedings or by the court concerned of its own motion) where a person is considering whether to apply for a declaration under this section, (c) provide for the Secretary of State, if not a party to proceedings in relation to which there is a declaration under this section or proceedings for or about such a declaration, to be joined as a party to the proceedings. (10) Rules of court must make provision— (a) requiring a person, before making an application under subsection (2)(a), to give notice of the person's intention to make an application to every other person entitled to make such an application in relation to the relevant civil proceedings, (b) requiring the applicant to inform every other such person of the outcome of the application. (11) In this section— “closed material application” means an application of the kind mentioned in section 8(1)(a), “relevant civil proceedings” means any proceedings (other than proceedings in a criminal cause or matter) before— the High Court, the Court of Appeal, the Court of Session, or the Supreme Court, “sensitive material” means material the disclosure of which would be damaging to the interests of national security.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds