Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
As published
137 Gold: penalty for failure to comply with record-keeping requirements etc.
(1) Part IV of the Value Added Tax Act 1994 (administration, collection and enforcement) is amended as follows.
(2) After section 69 (breaches of regulatory provisions) insert—
Breach of record-keeping requirements etc. in relation to transactions in gold.
69A (1) This section applies where a person fails to comply with a requirement of regulations under section 13(5)(a) or (b) of the Finance Act 1999 (gold: duties to keep records or provide information).
Where this section applies, the provisions of section 69 do not apply.
(2) A person who fails to comply with any such requirement is liable to a penalty not exceeding 17.5% of the value of the transactions to which the failure relates.
(3) For the purposes of assessing the amount of any such penalty, the value of the transactions to which the failure relates shall be determined by the Commissioners to the best of their judgement and notified by them to the person liable.
(4) No assessment of a penalty under this section shall be made more than 2 years after evidence of facts sufficient in the opinion of the Commissioners to justify the making of the assessment comes to their knowledge.
(5) The reference in subsection (4) above to facts sufficient to justify the making of the assessment is to facts sufficient—
(a) to indicate that there had been a failure to comply with any such requirement as is referred to in subsection (1) above, and
(b) to determine the value of the transactions to which the failure relates.
(6) A failure by any person to comply with any such requirement as is mentioned in subsection (1) above shall not give rise to a liability to a penalty under this section if the person concerned satisfies the Commissioners or, on appeal, a tribunal, that there is a reasonable excuse for the failure.
(7) Where by reason of conduct falling within subsection (1) above a person—
(a) is assessed to a penalty under section 60, or
(b) is convicted of an offence (whether under this Act or otherwise),
that conduct shall not also give rise to a penalty under this section.
.
(3) In section 70(1) of that Act (mitigation of penalties), for “or 67" substitute “ , 67 or 69A ”.
(4) In section 76(1) of that Act (assessment of amount due by way of penalty etc.), for “to 69" (in both places) substitute “ to 69A ”.
(5) In section 83 of that Act (appeals), in paragraph (n) for “59 to 69" substitute “ 59 to 69A ”.
Your change, as a redline
137 Gold: penalty for failure to comply with record-keeping requirements etc.
(1) Part IV of the Value Added Tax Act 1994 (administration, collection and enforcement) is amended as follows.
(2) After section 69 (breaches of regulatory provisions) insert—
Breach of record-keeping requirements etc. in relation to transactions in gold.
69A (1) This section applies where a person fails to comply with a requirement of regulations under section 13(5)(a) or (b) of the Finance Act 1999 (gold: duties to keep records or provide information).
Where this section applies, the provisions of section 69 do not apply.
(2) A person who fails to comply with any such requirement is liable to a penalty not exceeding 17.5% of the value of the transactions to which the failure relates.
(3) For the purposes of assessing the amount of any such penalty, the value of the transactions to which the failure relates shall be determined by the Commissioners to the best of their judgement and notified by them to the person liable.
(4) No assessment of a penalty under this section shall be made more than 2 years after evidence of facts sufficient in the opinion of the Commissioners to justify the making of the assessment comes to their knowledge.
(5) The reference in subsection (4) above to facts sufficient to justify the making of the assessment is to facts sufficient—
(a) to indicate that there had been a failure to comply with any such requirement as is referred to in subsection (1) above, and
(b) to determine the value of the transactions to which the failure relates.
(6) A failure by any person to comply with any such requirement as is mentioned in subsection (1) above shall not give rise to a liability to a penalty under this section if the person concerned satisfies the Commissioners or, on appeal, a tribunal, that there is a reasonable excuse for the failure.
(7) Where by reason of conduct falling within subsection (1) above a person—
(a) is assessed to a penalty under section 60, or
(b) is convicted of an offence (whether under this Act or otherwise),
that conduct shall not also give rise to a penalty under this section.
.
(3) In section 70(1) of that Act (mitigation of penalties), for “or 67" substitute “ , 67 or 69A ”.
(4) In section 76(1) of that Act (assessment of amount due by way of penalty etc.), for “to 69" (in both places) substitute “ to 69A ”.
(5) In section 83 of that Act (appeals), in paragraph (n) for “59 to 69" substitute “ 59 to 69A ”.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.