Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
As published
54 Regulatory conflict with other regulatory regimes
(1) The regulatory arrangements of an approved regulator must make such provision as is reasonably practicable and, in all the circumstances, appropriate—
(a) to prevent external regulatory conflicts,
(b) to provide for the resolution of any external regulatory conflicts which arise, and
(c) to prevent unnecessary duplication of regulatory provisions made by an external regulatory body.
(2) For the purposes of this section, an external regulatory conflict is a conflict between—
(a) a requirement of the regulatory arrangements of the approved regulator, and
(b) a requirement of any regulatory provision made by an external regulatory body.
(3) For this purpose “external regulatory body” means a person (other than an approved regulator) who exercises regulatory functions in relation to a particular description of persons with a view to ensuring compliance with rules (whether statutory or non-statutory) by those persons.
(4) Regulatory arrangements made for the purposes of subsection (1)(b) may, with the consent of the Board, provide for the Board to exercise functions in connection with the resolution of conflicts.
Your change, as a redline
54 Regulatory conflict with other regulatory regimes
(1) The regulatory arrangements of an approved regulator must make such provision as is reasonably practicable and, in all the circumstances, appropriate—
(a) to prevent external regulatory conflicts,
(b) to provide for the resolution of any external regulatory conflicts which arise, and
(c) to prevent unnecessary duplication of regulatory provisions made by an external regulatory body.
(2) For the purposes of this section, an external regulatory conflict is a conflict between—
(a) a requirement of the regulatory arrangements of the approved regulator, and
(b) a requirement of any regulatory provision made by an external regulatory body.
(3) For this purpose “external regulatory body” means a person (other than an approved regulator) who exercises regulatory functions in relation to a particular description of persons with a view to ensuring compliance with rules (whether statutory or non-statutory) by those persons.
(4) Regulatory arrangements made for the purposes of subsection (1)(b) may, with the consent of the Board, provide for the Board to exercise functions in connection with the resolution of conflicts.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.