Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
As published
137 Power of occupier or owner to exempt himself from liability on conviction of the actual offender.
(1) Where the occupier or owner of a factory is charged with an offence under this Act, he shall be entitled, upon information duly laid by him and on giving to the prosecution not less than three days' notice in writing of his intention, to have any other person whom he charges as the actual offender brought before the court at the time appointed for hearing the charge; and if, after the commission of the offence has been proved, the occupier or owner of the factory proves to the satisfaction of the court—
(a) that he has used all due diligence to enforce the execution of this Act and of any relevant order or regulation made thereunder; and
(b) that the said other person had committed the offence in question without his consent, connivance, or wilful default,
that other person shall be summarily convicted of the offence, and the occupier or owner shall not be guilty of the offence, and the person so convicted shall, in the discretion of the court, be also liable to pay any costs incidental to the
The prosecution shall have the right in any such case to cross-examine the occupier or owner if he gives evidence and any witnesses called by him in support of his charge, and to call rebutting evidence.
(2) When it is made to appear to the satisfaction of an inspector at the time of discovering an offence—
(a) that the occupier or owner (as the case may be) of the factory has used all due diligence to enforce the execution of this Act; and
(b) by what person the offence has been committed; and
(c) that it has been committed without the consent, connivance or wilful default of the occupier or owner and in contravention of his orders,
the inspector shall proceed against the person whom he believes to be the actual offender without first proceeding against the occupier or owner of the factory.
Your change, as a redline
137 Power of occupier or owner to exempt himself from liability on conviction of the actual offender.
(1) Where the occupier or owner of a factory is charged with an offence under this Act, he shall be entitled, upon information duly laid by him and on giving to the prosecution not less than three days' notice in writing of his intention, to have any other person whom he charges as the actual offender brought before the court at the time appointed for hearing the charge; and if, after the commission of the offence has been proved, the occupier or owner of the factory proves to the satisfaction of the court—
(a) that he has used all due diligence to enforce the execution of this Act and of any relevant order or regulation made thereunder; and
(b) that the said other person had committed the offence in question without his consent, connivance, or wilful default,
that other person shall be summarily convicted of the offence, and the occupier or owner shall not be guilty of the offence, and the person so convicted shall, in the discretion of the court, be also liable to pay any costs incidental to the
The prosecution shall have the right in any such case to cross-examine the occupier or owner if he gives evidence and any witnesses called by him in support of his charge, and to call rebutting evidence.
(2) When it is made to appear to the satisfaction of an inspector at the time of discovering an offence—
(a) that the occupier or owner (as the case may be) of the factory has used all due diligence to enforce the execution of this Act; and
(b) by what person the offence has been committed; and
(c) that it has been committed without the consent, connivance or wilful default of the occupier or owner and in contravention of his orders,
the inspector shall proceed against the person whom he believes to be the actual offender without first proceeding against the occupier or owner of the factory.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.