The Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
14 Reconsideration of rejection of claim
(1) A claimant whose claim has been rejected (in whole or in part) under rule 12 (rejection: claim form not used or failure to supply minimum information) or 13 (rejection: substantive defects) may apply for a reconsideration on the basis that either— (a) the decision to reject was wrong, or (b) the notified defect can be rectified. (2) An application under paragraph (1) must be in writing and it must be received by the Tribunal within 14 days of the date that the notice of rejection was sent. It must explain why the decision to reject is wrong or rectify the defect and it must state whether the claimant requests a hearing. (3) If the claimant does not request a hearing, or the Tribunal decides, on considering the application, that the claim is to be accepted in full, the Tribunal must determine the application without a hearing. Otherwise the application must be considered at a hearing attended only by the claimant. (4) If the Tribunal decides that the decision to reject the claim, or part of it, was correct but that the defect has been rectified, the claim must be treated as presented on the date that the application containing the rectification was received by the Tribunal.
14 Reconsideration of rejection of claim
(1) A claimant whose claim has been rejected (in whole or in part) under rule 12 (rejection: claim form not used or failure to supply minimum information) or 13 (rejection: substantive defects) may apply for a reconsideration on the basis that either— (a) the decision to reject was wrong, or (b) the notified defect can be rectified. (2) An application under paragraph (1) must be in writing and it must be received by the Tribunal within 14 days of the date that the notice of rejection was sent. It must explain why the decision to reject is wrong or rectify the defect and it must state whether the claimant requests a hearing. (3) If the claimant does not request a hearing, or the Tribunal decides, on considering the application, that the claim is to be accepted in full, the Tribunal must determine the application without a hearing. Otherwise the application must be considered at a hearing attended only by the claimant. (4) If the Tribunal decides that the decision to reject the claim, or part of it, was correct but that the defect has been rectified, the claim must be treated as presented on the date that the application containing the rectification was received by the Tribunal.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
How this law is officially changed
Solon does not know this law's official route yet. The proposal is recorded all the same, and the route appears here once its source is added.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.