The Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
24 Making an employer’s contract claim
(1) A respondent who wishes to make an employer’s contract claim must do so by including it as part of the response to a claim which includes an employee’s contract claim, and the Tribunal must receive the response by the time specified in rule 17(1) (response), or by any extension of time granted under rule 21 (applications for extension of time for presenting response). (2) The Tribunal may reject the whole or part of any employer’s contract claim on the ground that— (a) it has no jurisdiction, or (b) it does not contain any grounds on which the respondent relies, cannot sensibly be responded to or is an abuse of process. (3) Where the Tribunal rejects an employer’s contract claim, rule 14 (reconsideration of rejection of claim) applies except that— (a) references to a claimant or a claim must be read as a reference to a respondent or to an employer’s contract claim respectively, (b) reference to rule 12 is to be read as a reference to rule 24, and (c) reference to rule 13 is to be ignored.
24 Making an employer’s contract claim
(1) A respondent who wishes to make an employer’s contract claim must do so by including it as part of the response to a claim which includes an employee’s contract claim, and the Tribunal must receive the response by the time specified in rule 17(1) (response), or by any extension of time granted under rule 21 (applications for extension of time for presenting response). (2) The Tribunal may reject the whole or part of any employer’s contract claim on the ground that— (a) it has no jurisdiction, or (b) it does not contain any grounds on which the respondent relies, cannot sensibly be responded to or is an abuse of process. (3) Where the Tribunal rejects an employer’s contract claim, rule 14 (reconsideration of rejection of claim) applies except that— (a) references to a claimant or a claim must be read as a reference to a respondent or to an employer’s contract claim respectively, (b) reference to rule 12 is to be read as a reference to rule 24, and (c) reference to rule 13 is to be ignored.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
How this law is officially changed
Solon does not know this law's official route yet. The proposal is recorded all the same, and the route appears here once its source is added.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.