Tribunals and Inquiries Act 1971 (repealed 1.10.1992)
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
10 Procedural rules for tribunals.
(1) No power of a Minister, the Lord President of the Court of Session the Commissioners of Inland Revenue or the Commissioners of Customs and Excise to make, approve, confirm or concur in procedural rules for any such tribunal as is specified in Schedule 1 to this Act shall be exercisable except after consultation with the Council. (2) The Council, in the exercise of their functions under this section as respects any such tribunal as is specified in Part II of Schedule 1 to this Act, shall consult with the Scottish Committee. (3) In this section “procedural rules” includes any statutory provision relating to the procedure of the tribunal in question.
10 Procedural rules for tribunals.
(1) No power of a Minister, the Lord President of the Court of Session the Commissioners of Inland Revenue or the Commissioners of Customs and Excise to make, approve, confirm or concur in procedural rules for any such tribunal as is specified in Schedule 1 to this Act shall be exercisable except after consultation with the Council. (2) The Council, in the exercise of their functions under this section as respects any such tribunal as is specified in Part II of Schedule 1 to this Act, shall consult with the Scottish Committee. (3) In this section “procedural rules” includes any statutory provision relating to the procedure of the tribunal in question.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.