Tribunals and Inquiries Act 1971 (repealed 1.10.1992)
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
8 Concurrence required for removal of members of certain tribunals.
(1) Subject to subsection (2) of this section, no power of a Minister other than the Lord Chancellor to terminate a persons’s membership of any such tribunal as is specified in Schedule 1 to this Act, or of a panel constituted for the purposes of any such tribunal, shall be exercisable except with the consent of— (a) the Lord Chancellor, the Lord President of the Court of Session and the Lord Chief Justice of Northern Ireland, if the tribunal sits in all parts of the United Kingdom; (b) the Lord Chancellor and the Lord President of the Court of Session, if the tribunal sits in all parts of Great Britain; (c) the Lord Chancellor and the Lord Chief Justice of Northern Ireland, if the tribunal sits both in England and Wales and in Northern Ireland; (d) the Lord Chancellor, if the tribunal does not sit outside England and Wales; (e) the Lord President of the Court of Session, if the tribunal sits only in Scotland; (f) the Lord Chief Justice of Northern Ireland, if the tribunal sits only in Northern Ireland. (2) This section does not apply to any such tribunal as is specified in paragraph 2A5A, 5B,6A6B7A10A17(a), 22, 23(e), 25(a), 29(b), 30, 35 37A or 41(a) of Schedule 1 to this Act. (3) For the purposes of this section in its application to any such tribunal as is specified in paragraph 8(a) of Schedule 1 to this Act, an adjudicator who has sat only in England or Wales or who has sat only in Scotland or who has sat only in Northern Ireland shall be deemed to constitute a tribunal which does not sit outside England and Wales or which sits only in Scotland or which sits only in Northern Ireland, as the case may be.
8 Concurrence required for removal of members of certain tribunals.
(1) Subject to subsection (2) of this section, no power of a Minister other than the Lord Chancellor to terminate a persons’s membership of any such tribunal as is specified in Schedule 1 to this Act, or of a panel constituted for the purposes of any such tribunal, shall be exercisable except with the consent of— (a) the Lord Chancellor, the Lord President of the Court of Session and the Lord Chief Justice of Northern Ireland, if the tribunal sits in all parts of the United Kingdom; (b) the Lord Chancellor and the Lord President of the Court of Session, if the tribunal sits in all parts of Great Britain; (c) the Lord Chancellor and the Lord Chief Justice of Northern Ireland, if the tribunal sits both in England and Wales and in Northern Ireland; (d) the Lord Chancellor, if the tribunal does not sit outside England and Wales; (e) the Lord President of the Court of Session, if the tribunal sits only in Scotland; (f) the Lord Chief Justice of Northern Ireland, if the tribunal sits only in Northern Ireland. (2) This section does not apply to any such tribunal as is specified in paragraph 2A5A, 5B,6A6B7A10A17(a), 22, 23(e), 25(a), 29(b), 30, 35 37A or 41(a) of Schedule 1 to this Act. (3) For the purposes of this section in its application to any such tribunal as is specified in paragraph 8(a) of Schedule 1 to this Act, an adjudicator who has sat only in England or Wales or who has sat only in Scotland or who has sat only in Northern Ireland shall be deemed to constitute a tribunal which does not sit outside England and Wales or which sits only in Scotland or which sits only in Northern Ireland, as the case may be.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.