Propose a change

Banking Act 2009

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

206H “Market significance” and “systemic significance”

(1) A wholesale cash oversight order must specify whether the person in respect of whom the order is made is recognised— (a) as having market significance only, or (b) as also having systemic significance. (2) The Treasury may recognise a person as having market significance only if satisfied that any significant deficiency in, or disruption to, the performance of the person’s relevant functions in relation to wholesale cash distribution activities would be likely to undermine the effectiveness, resilience, or sustainability of wholesale cash distribution— (a) throughout the United Kingdom, or (b) throughout any part of the United Kingdom. (3) The Treasury may recognise a person as having systemic significance only if satisfied that any significant deficiency in, or disruption to, the performance of the person’s relevant functions in relation to wholesale cash distribution activities would be likely (in addition to the consequences mentioned in subsection (2))— (a) to threaten the stability of, or confidence in, the UK financial system, or (b) to have serious consequences for business or other interests throughout the United Kingdom or any part of the United Kingdom. (4) Where a person is part of a group, the Treasury may have regard to functions performed by other members of the group when determining matters mentioned in subsection (2) or (3). (5) In subsection (4), “group” has the meaning given by section 421 of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000. (6) The Treasury must not recognise a company wholly owned by the Crown as having systemic significance.

Your change, as a redline

206H “Market significance” and “systemic significance”

(1) A wholesale cash oversight order must specify whether the person in respect of whom the order is made is recognised— (a) as having market significance only, or (b) as also having systemic significance. (2) The Treasury may recognise a person as having market significance only if satisfied that any significant deficiency in, or disruption to, the performance of the person’s relevant functions in relation to wholesale cash distribution activities would be likely to undermine the effectiveness, resilience, or sustainability of wholesale cash distribution— (a) throughout the United Kingdom, or (b) throughout any part of the United Kingdom. (3) The Treasury may recognise a person as having systemic significance only if satisfied that any significant deficiency in, or disruption to, the performance of the person’s relevant functions in relation to wholesale cash distribution activities would be likely (in addition to the consequences mentioned in subsection (2))— (a) to threaten the stability of, or confidence in, the UK financial system, or (b) to have serious consequences for business or other interests throughout the United Kingdom or any part of the United Kingdom. (4) Where a person is part of a group, the Treasury may have regard to functions performed by other members of the group when determining matters mentioned in subsection (2) or (3). (5) In subsection (4), “group” has the meaning given by section 421 of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000. (6) The Treasury must not recognise a company wholly owned by the Crown as having systemic significance.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds