Propose a change

Banking Act 2009

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

83ZF Investigations: general

(1) This section applies if the Bank of England appoints one or more competent persons (“investigators“) under section 83ZC or 83ZD to conduct an investigation on its behalf. (2) The Bank must give written notice of the appointment of an investigator to the person who is the subject of the investigation (“the person under investigation”). (3) A notice under subsection (2) must— (a) specify the provisions under which, and as a result of which, the investigator was appointed, and (b) state the reason for the investigator’s appointment. (4) Nothing prevents the Bank from appointing a person who is a member of its staff as an investigator. (5) An investigator must make a report of the investigation to the Bank. (6) The Bank may, by a direction to an investigator, control— (a) the scope of the investigation, (b) the period during which the investigation is to be conducted, (c) the conduct of the investigation, and (d) the reporting of the investigation. (7) A direction may, in particular— (a) confine the investigation to particular matters; (b) extend the investigation to additional matters; (c) require the investigator to discontinue the investigation or to take only such steps as are specified in the direction; (d) require the investigator to make such interim reports as are so specified. (8) If there is a change in the scope or conduct of the investigation and, in the opinion of the Bank, the person under investigation is likely to be significantly prejudiced by not being made aware of it, that person must be given written notice of the change. (9) If the appointment is under section 83ZD, subsections (2) and (8) do not apply if the Bank believes that the notice required by the subsection in question would be likely to result in the investigation being frustrated.

Your change, as a redline

83ZF Investigations: general

(1) This section applies if the Bank of England appoints one or more competent persons (“investigators“) under section 83ZC or 83ZD to conduct an investigation on its behalf. (2) The Bank must give written notice of the appointment of an investigator to the person who is the subject of the investigation (“the person under investigation”). (3) A notice under subsection (2) must— (a) specify the provisions under which, and as a result of which, the investigator was appointed, and (b) state the reason for the investigator’s appointment. (4) Nothing prevents the Bank from appointing a person who is a member of its staff as an investigator. (5) An investigator must make a report of the investigation to the Bank. (6) The Bank may, by a direction to an investigator, control— (a) the scope of the investigation, (b) the period during which the investigation is to be conducted, (c) the conduct of the investigation, and (d) the reporting of the investigation. (7) A direction may, in particular— (a) confine the investigation to particular matters; (b) extend the investigation to additional matters; (c) require the investigator to discontinue the investigation or to take only such steps as are specified in the direction; (d) require the investigator to make such interim reports as are so specified. (8) If there is a change in the scope or conduct of the investigation and, in the opinion of the Bank, the person under investigation is likely to be significantly prejudiced by not being made aware of it, that person must be given written notice of the change. (9) If the appointment is under section 83ZD, subsections (2) and (8) do not apply if the Bank believes that the notice required by the subsection in question would be likely to result in the investigation being frustrated.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds