Propose a change

Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

163 Transfer of jurisdiction of court to tribunal

(1) Part 4 of the 1987 Act (variation of leases) is amended as follows. (2) In section 35 (application by party to lease for variation of lease)— (a) in subsection (1), for “the court” substitute “ a leasehold valuation tribunal ”, and (b) in subsection (5), for “Rules of court” substitute “ Procedure regulations under Schedule 12 to the Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002 ”. (3) In section 36(1) (application by respondent for variation of other leases), for “court” substitute “ tribunal ”. (4) In section 37(1) (application by majority of parties for variation of leases), for “the court” substitute “ a leasehold valuation tribunal ”. (5) In section 38 (orders varying leases)— (a) in subsections (1) to (5), for “court” (in each place) substitute “ tribunal ”, (b) in subsection (6)— (i) for “The court” substitute “ A tribunal ”, and (ii) for “the court” substitute “ the tribunal ”, (c) in subsections (7) to (9), for “The court” substitute “ A tribunal ”, and (d) in subsection (10)— (i) for “the court”, in the first place, substitute “ a tribunal ”, and (ii) for “the court”, in the other two places, substitute “ the tribunal ”. (6) In section 39 (applications by third parties for orders varying leases)— (a) in subsection (3)(b), for “the court” substitute “ a leasehold valuation tribunal ”, (b) in subsection (4), for “The court” substitute “ A tribunal ”, and (c) in subsection (5)(b), for “court” substitute “ tribunal ”. (7) In section 40(1) (variation of insurance provisions of dwelling other than flat), for “the court” substitute “ a leasehold valuation tribunal ”. (8) In consequence of the preceding provisions, in section 52(2)(a) of the 1987 Act (jurisdiction of county courts), for “, 3 and 4” substitute “ and 3 ”.

Your change, as a redline

163 Transfer of jurisdiction of court to tribunal

(1) Part 4 of the 1987 Act (variation of leases) is amended as follows. (2) In section 35 (application by party to lease for variation of lease)— (a) in subsection (1), for “the court” substitute “ a leasehold valuation tribunal ”, and (b) in subsection (5), for “Rules of court” substitute “ Procedure regulations under Schedule 12 to the Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002 ”. (3) In section 36(1) (application by respondent for variation of other leases), for “court” substitute “ tribunal ”. (4) In section 37(1) (application by majority of parties for variation of leases), for “the court” substitute “ a leasehold valuation tribunal ”. (5) In section 38 (orders varying leases)— (a) in subsections (1) to (5), for “court” (in each place) substitute “ tribunal ”, (b) in subsection (6)— (i) for “The court” substitute “ A tribunal ”, and (ii) for “the court” substitute “ the tribunal ”, (c) in subsections (7) to (9), for “The court” substitute “ A tribunal ”, and (d) in subsection (10)— (i) for “the court”, in the first place, substitute “ a tribunal ”, and (ii) for “the court”, in the other two places, substitute “ the tribunal ”. (6) In section 39 (applications by third parties for orders varying leases)— (a) in subsection (3)(b), for “the court” substitute “ a leasehold valuation tribunal ”, (b) in subsection (4), for “The court” substitute “ A tribunal ”, and (c) in subsection (5)(b), for “court” substitute “ tribunal ”. (7) In section 40(1) (variation of insurance provisions of dwelling other than flat), for “the court” substitute “ a leasehold valuation tribunal ”. (8) In consequence of the preceding provisions, in section 52(2)(a) of the 1987 Act (jurisdiction of county courts), for “, 3 and 4” substitute “ and 3 ”.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds