Council Regulation (EEC) No 3620/87 of 30 November 1987 concerning the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Economic Community and the Government of the People's Republic of Angola on fishing off Angola
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
Article 1
The purpose of this Agreement is to establish the principles and rules intended in future to govern all aspects of relations in the sphere of fisheries between the Community and Angola, including the fishing activities of vessels flying the flags of Member States of the Community, hereinafter referred to as ‘Community vessels’, in the waters over which Angola has sovereignty or jurisdiction in respect of fisheries, hereinafter referred to as ‘Angola's fishing zone’, in accordance with the provisions of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea and other rules of international law.
Article 1
The purpose of this Agreement is to establish the principles and rules intended in future to govern all aspects of relations in the sphere of fisheries between the Community and Angola, including the fishing activities of vessels flying the flags of Member States of the Community, hereinafter referred to as ‘Community vessels’, in the waters over which Angola has sovereignty or jurisdiction in respect of fisheries, hereinafter referred to as ‘Angola's fishing zone’, in accordance with the provisions of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea and other rules of international law.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.