Local Government and Public Involvement in Health Act 2007
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
88 Existing parishes under review
(1) A community governance review must make the following recommendations in relation to each of the existing parishes under review (if any). (2) The review must make one of the following recommendations— (a) recommendations that the parish should not be abolished and that its area should not be altered; (b) recommendations that the area of the parish should be altered; (c) recommendations that the parish should be abolished. (3) The review must make recommendations as to whether or not the name of the parish should be changed. (4) The review must make one of the following recommendations— (a) if the parish does not have a council: recommendations as to whether or not the parish should have a council; (b) if the parish has a council: recommendations as to whether or not the parish should continue to have a council. (5) But the review may not make any recommendations for the parish— (a) to begin to have an alternative style (if it does not already have one), or (b) to cease to have an alternative style, or to have a different alternative style, (if it already has one). (6) In this section— (a) “existing parishes under review” means each of the parishes (if any) which are already in existence in the area under review; (b) references to the alteration of an area of a parish are references to any alteration which is not the constitution of a new parish (within the meaning of section 87(2)).
88 Existing parishes under review
(1) A community governance review must make the following recommendations in relation to each of the existing parishes under review (if any). (2) The review must make one of the following recommendations— (a) recommendations that the parish should not be abolished and that its area should not be altered; (b) recommendations that the area of the parish should be altered; (c) recommendations that the parish should be abolished. (3) The review must make recommendations as to whether or not the name of the parish should be changed. (4) The review must make one of the following recommendations— (a) if the parish does not have a council: recommendations as to whether or not the parish should have a council; (b) if the parish has a council: recommendations as to whether or not the parish should continue to have a council. (5) But the review may not make any recommendations for the parish— (a) to begin to have an alternative style (if it does not already have one), or (b) to cease to have an alternative style, or to have a different alternative style, (if it already has one). (6) In this section— (a) “existing parishes under review” means each of the parishes (if any) which are already in existence in the area under review; (b) references to the alteration of an area of a parish are references to any alteration which is not the constitution of a new parish (within the meaning of section 87(2)).
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.