Local Government and Public Involvement in Health Act 2007
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
93 Duties when undertaking a review
(1) The principal council must comply with the duties in this section when undertaking a community governance review. (2) But, subject to those duties, it is for the principal council to decide how to undertake the review. (3) The principal council must consult the following— (a) the local government electors for the area under review; (b) any other person or body (including a local authority) which appears to the principal council to have an interest in the review. (4) The principal council must have regard to the need to secure that community governance within the area under review— (a) reflects the identities and interests of the community in that area, and (b) is effective and convenient. (5) In deciding what recommendations to make, the principal council must take into account any other arrangements (apart from those relating to parishes and their institutions)— (a) that have already been made, or (b) that could be made, for the purposes of community representation or community engagement in respect of the area under review. (6) The principal council must take into account any representations received in connection with the review. (7) As soon as practicable after making any recommendations, the principal council must— (a) publish the recommendations; and (b) take such steps as it considers sufficient to secure that persons who may be interested in the review are informed of those recommendations. (8) The principal council must conclude the review within the period of 12 months starting with the day on which the council receives the community governance petition or community governance application.
93 Duties when undertaking a review
(1) The principal council must comply with the duties in this section when undertaking a community governance review. (2) But, subject to those duties, it is for the principal council to decide how to undertake the review. (3) The principal council must consult the following— (a) the local government electors for the area under review; (b) any other person or body (including a local authority) which appears to the principal council to have an interest in the review. (4) The principal council must have regard to the need to secure that community governance within the area under review— (a) reflects the identities and interests of the community in that area, and (b) is effective and convenient. (5) In deciding what recommendations to make, the principal council must take into account any other arrangements (apart from those relating to parishes and their institutions)— (a) that have already been made, or (b) that could be made, for the purposes of community representation or community engagement in respect of the area under review. (6) The principal council must take into account any representations received in connection with the review. (7) As soon as practicable after making any recommendations, the principal council must— (a) publish the recommendations; and (b) take such steps as it considers sufficient to secure that persons who may be interested in the review are informed of those recommendations. (8) The principal council must conclude the review within the period of 12 months starting with the day on which the council receives the community governance petition or community governance application.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.