The Haiti (Sanctions) (Amendment) Regulations 2025
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
8 Amendments to regulation 17 (making small arms, light weapons and ammunition available)
In regulation 17— (a) in the heading, for “small arms, light weapons and ammunition” substitute “military goods and military technology”; (b) in paragraph (1), omit “ directly or indirectly make small arms, light weapons and ammunition available to, or for use in, Haiti.”; (c) in paragraph (1), after “not” insert— — (a) directly or indirectly make military goods or military technology available to a person connected with Haiti; (b) directly or indirectly make military goods or military technology available for use in Haiti. ; (d) in paragraph (3), omit “ it is a defence for a person charged with that offence (“P”) to show that P did not know and had no reasonable cause to suspect that the goods were for use in Haiti.”; (e) in paragraph (3), after “but” insert— — (a) it is a defence for a person charged with the offence of contravening paragraph (1)(a) (“P”) to show that P did not know and had no reasonable cause to suspect that the person was connected with Haiti; (b) it is a defence for a person charged with the offence of contravening paragraph (1)(b) to show that the person did not know and had no reasonable cause to suspect that the goods or technology were for use in Haiti. .
8 Amendments to regulation 17 (making small arms, light weapons and ammunition available)
In regulation 17— (a) in the heading, for “small arms, light weapons and ammunition” substitute “military goods and military technology”; (b) in paragraph (1), omit “ directly or indirectly make small arms, light weapons and ammunition available to, or for use in, Haiti.”; (c) in paragraph (1), after “not” insert— — (a) directly or indirectly make military goods or military technology available to a person connected with Haiti; (b) directly or indirectly make military goods or military technology available for use in Haiti. ; (d) in paragraph (3), omit “ it is a defence for a person charged with that offence (“P”) to show that P did not know and had no reasonable cause to suspect that the goods were for use in Haiti.”; (e) in paragraph (3), after “but” insert— — (a) it is a defence for a person charged with the offence of contravening paragraph (1)(a) (“P”) to show that P did not know and had no reasonable cause to suspect that the person was connected with Haiti; (b) it is a defence for a person charged with the offence of contravening paragraph (1)(b) to show that the person did not know and had no reasonable cause to suspect that the goods or technology were for use in Haiti. .
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.