Propose a change

Postal Services Act 2000

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

83 Interfering with the mail: postal operators.

(1) A person who is engaged in the business of a postal operator commits an offence if, contrary to his duty and without reasonable excuse, he— (a) intentionally delays or opens a postal packet in the course of its transmission by post, or (b) intentionally opens a mail-bag. (2) Subsection (1) does not apply to the delaying or opening of a postal packet or the opening of a mail-bag under the authority of— (a) this Act or any other enactment (including, in particular, in pursuance of a warrant issued under any other enactment), . . . (b) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (3) Subsection (1) does not apply to the delaying or opening of a postal packet in accordance with any terms and conditions applicable to its transmission by post. (4) Subsection (1) does not apply to the delaying of a postal packet as a result of industrial action in contemplation or furtherance of a trade dispute. (5) In subsection (4) “trade dispute” has the meaning given by section 244 of the M1Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 or Article 127 of the M2Trade Union and Labour Relations (Northern Ireland) Order 1995; and the reference to industrial action shall be construed in accordance with that Act or (as the case may be) that Order. (6) A person who commits an offence under subsection (1) shall be liable— (a) on summary conviction, to a fine not exceeding the statutory maximum or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding six months or to both, (b) on conviction on indictment, to a fine or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years or to both.

Your change, as a redline

83 Interfering with the mail: postal operators.

(1) A person who is engaged in the business of a postal operator commits an offence if, contrary to his duty and without reasonable excuse, he— (a) intentionally delays or opens a postal packet in the course of its transmission by post, or (b) intentionally opens a mail-bag. (2) Subsection (1) does not apply to the delaying or opening of a postal packet or the opening of a mail-bag under the authority of— (a) this Act or any other enactment (including, in particular, in pursuance of a warrant issued under any other enactment), . . . (b) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (3) Subsection (1) does not apply to the delaying or opening of a postal packet in accordance with any terms and conditions applicable to its transmission by post. (4) Subsection (1) does not apply to the delaying of a postal packet as a result of industrial action in contemplation or furtherance of a trade dispute. (5) In subsection (4) “trade dispute” has the meaning given by section 244 of the M1Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 or Article 127 of the M2Trade Union and Labour Relations (Northern Ireland) Order 1995; and the reference to industrial action shall be construed in accordance with that Act or (as the case may be) that Order. (6) A person who commits an offence under subsection (1) shall be liable— (a) on summary conviction, to a fine not exceeding the statutory maximum or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding six months or to both, (b) on conviction on indictment, to a fine or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years or to both.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds