Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
As published
88 Obstruction of business of universal service providers.
(1) A person commits an offence if, without reasonable excuse, he—
(a) obstructs a person engaged in the business of a universal service provider in the execution of his duty in connection with the provision of a universal postal service, or
(b) obstructs, while in any universal postal service post office or related premises, the course of business of a universal service provider.
(2) A person who commits an offence under subsection (1) shall be liable on summary conviction to a fine not exceeding level 2 on the standard scale.
(3) A person commits an offence if, without reasonable excuse, he fails to leave a universal postal service post office or related premises when required to do so by a person who—
(a) is engaged in the business of a universal service provider, and
(b) reasonably suspects him of committing an offence under subsection (1).
(4) A person who commits an offence under subsection (3)—
(a) shall be liable on summary conviction to a fine not exceeding level 2 on the standard scale, and
(b) may be removed by any person engaged in the business of a universal service provider.
(5) Any constable shall on demand remove, or assist in removing, any such person.
(6) In this section “related premises” means any premises belonging to a universal postal service post office or used together with any such post office.
Your change, as a redline
88 Obstruction of business of universal service providers.
(1) A person commits an offence if, without reasonable excuse, he—
(a) obstructs a person engaged in the business of a universal service provider in the execution of his duty in connection with the provision of a universal postal service, or
(b) obstructs, while in any universal postal service post office or related premises, the course of business of a universal service provider.
(2) A person who commits an offence under subsection (1) shall be liable on summary conviction to a fine not exceeding level 2 on the standard scale.
(3) A person commits an offence if, without reasonable excuse, he fails to leave a universal postal service post office or related premises when required to do so by a person who—
(a) is engaged in the business of a universal service provider, and
(b) reasonably suspects him of committing an offence under subsection (1).
(4) A person who commits an offence under subsection (3)—
(a) shall be liable on summary conviction to a fine not exceeding level 2 on the standard scale, and
(b) may be removed by any person engaged in the business of a universal service provider.
(5) Any constable shall on demand remove, or assist in removing, any such person.
(6) In this section “related premises” means any premises belonging to a universal postal service post office or used together with any such post office.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.