Nationality and Borders Act 2022
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
52 Use of scientific methods in age assessments
(1) The Secretary of State may make regulations specifying scientific methods that may be used for the purposes of age assessments under section 50 or 51. (2) The types of scientific method that may be specified include methods involving— (a) examining or measuring parts of a person’s body, including by the use of imaging technology; (b) the analysis of saliva, cell or other samples taken from a person (including the analysis of DNA in the samples). (3) A method may not be specified in regulations under subsection (1) unless the Secretary of State determines, after having sought scientific advice, that the method is appropriate for assessing a person’s age. (4) A specified scientific method may be used for the purposes of an age assessment under section 50 or 51 only if the appropriate consent is given. (5) The appropriate consent is— (a) where the age-disputed person has the capacity to consent to the use of the scientific method in question, their consent; (b) where the age-disputed person does not have the capacity to consent to the use of the scientific method in question, the consent of— (i) the person’s parent or guardian, or (ii) another person, of a description specified in regulations made by the Secretary of State, who is able to give consent on behalf of the age-disputed person. (6) Subsection (7) applies where— (a) the age-disputed person or, in a case where the age-disputed person lacks capacity, a person mentioned in subsection (5)(b), decides not to consent to the use of a specified scientific method, and (b) there are no reasonable grounds for that decision. (7) In deciding whether to believe any statement made by or on behalf of the age-disputed person that is relevant to the assessment of their age, the decision-maker must take into account, as damaging the age-disputed person’s credibility (or the credibility of a person who has made a statement on their behalf), the decision not to consent to the use of the specified scientific method. (8) Regulations under this section are subject to affirmative resolution procedure. (9) This section does not prevent the use of a scientific method that is not a specified scientific method for the purposes of an age assessment under section 50 or 51 if the decision-maker considers it appropriate to do so and, where necessary, the appropriate consent is given.
52 Use of scientific methods in age assessments
(1) The Secretary of State may make regulations specifying scientific methods that may be used for the purposes of age assessments under section 50 or 51. (2) The types of scientific method that may be specified include methods involving— (a) examining or measuring parts of a person’s body, including by the use of imaging technology; (b) the analysis of saliva, cell or other samples taken from a person (including the analysis of DNA in the samples). (3) A method may not be specified in regulations under subsection (1) unless the Secretary of State determines, after having sought scientific advice, that the method is appropriate for assessing a person’s age. (4) A specified scientific method may be used for the purposes of an age assessment under section 50 or 51 only if the appropriate consent is given. (5) The appropriate consent is— (a) where the age-disputed person has the capacity to consent to the use of the scientific method in question, their consent; (b) where the age-disputed person does not have the capacity to consent to the use of the scientific method in question, the consent of— (i) the person’s parent or guardian, or (ii) another person, of a description specified in regulations made by the Secretary of State, who is able to give consent on behalf of the age-disputed person. (6) Subsection (7) applies where— (a) the age-disputed person or, in a case where the age-disputed person lacks capacity, a person mentioned in subsection (5)(b), decides not to consent to the use of a specified scientific method, and (b) there are no reasonable grounds for that decision. (7) In deciding whether to believe any statement made by or on behalf of the age-disputed person that is relevant to the assessment of their age, the decision-maker must take into account, as damaging the age-disputed person’s credibility (or the credibility of a person who has made a statement on their behalf), the decision not to consent to the use of the specified scientific method. (8) Regulations under this section are subject to affirmative resolution procedure. (9) This section does not prevent the use of a scientific method that is not a specified scientific method for the purposes of an age assessment under section 50 or 51 if the decision-maker considers it appropriate to do so and, where necessary, the appropriate consent is given.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.