Propose a change

The Securitisation Regulations 2024

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

32D Due-diligence requirements for occupational pension schemes: delegation of investment management decisions

(1) Paragraph (2) applies where— (a) the trustees or managers of an occupational pension scheme— (i) have given a relevant institutional investor (“the managing party”) authority to make investment management decisions that might expose the trustees or managers to a securitisation, and (ii) instruct the managing party to fulfil any of their obligations under regulations 32B and 32C in respect of any exposure to a securitisation arising from those decisions, and (b) the managing party fails to fulfil an obligation to which those instructions relate. (2) The trustees or managers of the occupational pension scheme are not to be regarded as responsible for the failure to comply with the obligation in question. (3) In this regulation “relevant institutional investor” means an institutional investor which is an authorised person.

Your change, as a redline

32D Due-diligence requirements for occupational pension schemes: delegation of investment management decisions

(1) Paragraph (2) applies where— (a) the trustees or managers of an occupational pension scheme— (i) have given a relevant institutional investor (“the managing party”) authority to make investment management decisions that might expose the trustees or managers to a securitisation, and (ii) instruct the managing party to fulfil any of their obligations under regulations 32B and 32C in respect of any exposure to a securitisation arising from those decisions, and (b) the managing party fails to fulfil an obligation to which those instructions relate. (2) The trustees or managers of the occupational pension scheme are not to be regarded as responsible for the failure to comply with the obligation in question. (3) In this regulation “relevant institutional investor” means an institutional investor which is an authorised person.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

How this law is officially changed

Solon does not know this law's official route yet. The proposal is recorded all the same, and the route appears here once its source is added.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds