Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
As published
22 Advance pricing agreements: indirect participation in financing cases
(1) In section 158 of TIOPA 2010 (which sets out how to read references to indirect participation for the purposes of, among other provisions, provisions relating to advance pricing agreements under Part 5 of that Act)—
(a) in subsection (4), omit paragraph (c) (but not the “and” at the end of that paragraph), and
(b) after that subsection insert—
(5) For the purposes of section 219(2) (which is in Part 5), a person is indirectly participating in the management, control or capital of another person only if any of sections 159 to 162 so provide.
(2) In section 161 of that Act (indirect participation in financing cases)—
(a) in subsection (1), at the end insert “and, in Part 5, section 219(2)”, and
(b) in the heading, for “and 175” substitute “, 175 and 219(2)”.
(3) In section 162 of that Act (indirect participation in further financing cases)—
(a) in subsection (1), at the end insert “and, in Part 5, section 219(2)”, and
(b) in the heading, for “and 175” substitute “, 175 and 219(2)”.
(4) In section 219(4) of that Act (which sets out how to interpret references to associates by referring to, among other provisions, provisions in Part 4 of that Act that explain the meaning of indirect participation), for “and 160(1)” substitute “, 160(1), 161(1) and 162(1)”.
(5) The amendments made by this section are treated as always having had effect.
Your change, as a redline
22 Advance pricing agreements: indirect participation in financing cases
(1) In section 158 of TIOPA 2010 (which sets out how to read references to indirect participation for the purposes of, among other provisions, provisions relating to advance pricing agreements under Part 5 of that Act)—
(a) in subsection (4), omit paragraph (c) (but not the “and” at the end of that paragraph), and
(b) after that subsection insert—
(5) For the purposes of section 219(2) (which is in Part 5), a person is indirectly participating in the management, control or capital of another person only if any of sections 159 to 162 so provide.
(2) In section 161 of that Act (indirect participation in financing cases)—
(a) in subsection (1), at the end insert “and, in Part 5, section 219(2)”, and
(b) in the heading, for “and 175” substitute “, 175 and 219(2)”.
(3) In section 162 of that Act (indirect participation in further financing cases)—
(a) in subsection (1), at the end insert “and, in Part 5, section 219(2)”, and
(b) in the heading, for “and 175” substitute “, 175 and 219(2)”.
(4) In section 219(4) of that Act (which sets out how to interpret references to associates by referring to, among other provisions, provisions in Part 4 of that Act that explain the meaning of indirect participation), for “and 160(1)” substitute “, 160(1), 161(1) and 162(1)”.
(5) The amendments made by this section are treated as always having had effect.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.