Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
As published
6 Appropriate percentage for cars: subsequent tax years
(1) Chapter 6 of Part 3 of ITEPA 2003 (taxable benefits: cars, vans etc), as amended by section 5, is amended as follows.
(2) In section 139 of ITEPA 2003, in subsection (1), for the table substitute—
Car | Appropriate percentage
Car with CO2 emissions figure of 0 | 9%
Car with CO2 emissions figure of 1–50 | 19%
Car with CO2 emissions figure of 51–54 | 20%
Car with CO2 emissions figure of 55–59 | 21%
Car with CO2 emissions figure of 60–64 | 22%
Car with CO2 emissions figure of 65–74 | 23%
.
(3) In subsection (3) of that section—
(a) in paragraph (a), for “22%” substitute “23%”, and
(b) in paragraph (b), for “38%” substitute “39%”.
(4) In section 140 (cars without a CO2 emissions figure: the appropriate percentage), in subsection (2), for the table substitute—
Cylinder capacity of car in cubic centimetres | Appropriate percentage
1,400 or less | 26%
More than 1,4000 but not more than 2,000 | 37%
More than 2,000 | 39%
.
(5) In subsection (3) of section 140—
(a) in paragraph (a), for “7%” substitute “9%”, and
(b) in paragraph (b), for “38%” substitute “39%”.
(6) In section 141 (diesel cars: the appropriate percentage), in subsection (2), in Step 3, for “38%” substitute “39%”.
(7) In section 142 (cars first registered before 1 January 1998: the appropriate percentage), in subsection (2), for the table substitute—
Cylinder capacity of car in cubic centimetres | Appropriate percentage
1,400 or less | 26%
More than 1,4000 but not more than 2,000 | 37%
More than 2,000 | 39%
.
(8) In subsection (3) of section 142, for “38%” substitute “39%”.
(9) The amendments made by this section have effect for the tax year 2029-30 and subsequent tax years.
Your change, as a redline
6 Appropriate percentage for cars: subsequent tax years
(1) Chapter 6 of Part 3 of ITEPA 2003 (taxable benefits: cars, vans etc), as amended by section 5, is amended as follows.
(2) In section 139 of ITEPA 2003, in subsection (1), for the table substitute—
Car | Appropriate percentage
Car with CO2 emissions figure of 0 | 9%
Car with CO2 emissions figure of 1–50 | 19%
Car with CO2 emissions figure of 51–54 | 20%
Car with CO2 emissions figure of 55–59 | 21%
Car with CO2 emissions figure of 60–64 | 22%
Car with CO2 emissions figure of 65–74 | 23%
.
(3) In subsection (3) of that section—
(a) in paragraph (a), for “22%” substitute “23%”, and
(b) in paragraph (b), for “38%” substitute “39%”.
(4) In section 140 (cars without a CO2 emissions figure: the appropriate percentage), in subsection (2), for the table substitute—
Cylinder capacity of car in cubic centimetres | Appropriate percentage
1,400 or less | 26%
More than 1,4000 but not more than 2,000 | 37%
More than 2,000 | 39%
.
(5) In subsection (3) of section 140—
(a) in paragraph (a), for “7%” substitute “9%”, and
(b) in paragraph (b), for “38%” substitute “39%”.
(6) In section 141 (diesel cars: the appropriate percentage), in subsection (2), in Step 3, for “38%” substitute “39%”.
(7) In section 142 (cars first registered before 1 January 1998: the appropriate percentage), in subsection (2), for the table substitute—
Cylinder capacity of car in cubic centimetres | Appropriate percentage
1,400 or less | 26%
More than 1,4000 but not more than 2,000 | 37%
More than 2,000 | 39%
.
(8) In subsection (3) of section 142, for “38%” substitute “39%”.
(9) The amendments made by this section have effect for the tax year 2029-30 and subsequent tax years.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.