Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
As published
SCHEDULE 19 Repeals
Section 114(2)
Short title | Extent of repeal
Bank of England Act 1998 | Section 1(3).
Competition Act 1998 | In Schedule 2, paragraph 1 and the italic heading before it.
In Schedule 7, in paragraph 19A(9)— “or (in the case of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (c 8)) an investigation”, and paragraph (m).
In Schedule 12, paragraph 8 and the italic heading before it.
In Schedule 13, in paragraph 26— sub-paragraph (1)(a), sub-paragraph (2), in sub-paragraph (3) the words “and (2)”, and sub-paragraph (3)(a).
Insolvency Act 2000 | Section 15(2).
Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 | In Schedule 11, paragraph 38 and the italic heading before it.
Enterprise Act 2002 | Sections 241A(2)(b) and 243(3)(c).
In Schedule 25, sub-paragraphs (2) to (5) and (10) to (15) of paragraph 40.
Communications Act 2003 | In Schedule 16, paragraph 5 and the italic heading before it.
Constitutional Reform Act 2005 | In Schedule 7, the entry relating to the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000.
In Schedule 9, paragraph 70 and the italic heading before it.
Inquiries Act 2005 | Section 46.
Companies Act 2006 | Section 964(3) and (5).
In Part 2 of Schedule 2, paragraph 38.
In Schedule 11A, paragraph 53.
In Schedule 15, paragraphs 2 and 9.
Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007 | In Schedule 6, in the Table in Part 3, the entry relating to the Financial Services and Markets Tribunal.
Consumers, Estate Agents and Redress Act 2007 | In section 20— in subsection (2), in the definition of “designated body”, paragraph (b), and subsection (3)(a).
Section 39.
In Schedule 1, paragraph 1(4)(a).
Banking Act 2009 | Section 249(4).
Financial Services Act 2010 | Section 1.
Section 2(2) to (5).
Section 3(2) to (4).
Section 6.
Section 7.
In Schedule 2, paragraphs 2 to 6, 11 to 14, 27 and 34.
Your change, as a redline
SCHEDULE 19 Repeals
Section 114(2)
Short title | Extent of repeal
Bank of England Act 1998 | Section 1(3).
Competition Act 1998 | In Schedule 2, paragraph 1 and the italic heading before it.
In Schedule 7, in paragraph 19A(9)— “or (in the case of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (c 8)) an investigation”, and paragraph (m).
In Schedule 12, paragraph 8 and the italic heading before it.
In Schedule 13, in paragraph 26— sub-paragraph (1)(a), sub-paragraph (2), in sub-paragraph (3) the words “and (2)”, and sub-paragraph (3)(a).
Insolvency Act 2000 | Section 15(2).
Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 | In Schedule 11, paragraph 38 and the italic heading before it.
Enterprise Act 2002 | Sections 241A(2)(b) and 243(3)(c).
In Schedule 25, sub-paragraphs (2) to (5) and (10) to (15) of paragraph 40.
Communications Act 2003 | In Schedule 16, paragraph 5 and the italic heading before it.
Constitutional Reform Act 2005 | In Schedule 7, the entry relating to the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000.
In Schedule 9, paragraph 70 and the italic heading before it.
Inquiries Act 2005 | Section 46.
Companies Act 2006 | Section 964(3) and (5).
In Part 2 of Schedule 2, paragraph 38.
In Schedule 11A, paragraph 53.
In Schedule 15, paragraphs 2 and 9.
Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007 | In Schedule 6, in the Table in Part 3, the entry relating to the Financial Services and Markets Tribunal.
Consumers, Estate Agents and Redress Act 2007 | In section 20— in subsection (2), in the definition of “designated body”, paragraph (b), and subsection (3)(a).
Section 39.
In Schedule 1, paragraph 1(4)(a).
Banking Act 2009 | Section 249(4).
Financial Services Act 2010 | Section 1.
Section 2(2) to (5).
Section 3(2) to (4).
Section 6.
Section 7.
In Schedule 2, paragraphs 2 to 6, 11 to 14, 27 and 34.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.