Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
As published
84 Arrangements for the investigation of complaints
(1) The regulators must—
(a) make arrangements (“the complaints scheme”) for the investigation of complaints arising in connection with the exercise of, or failure to exercise, any of their relevant functions (see section 85). ...
(b) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(1A) The Treasury must appoint an independent person (“the investigator”) to be responsible for the conduct of investigations in accordance with the complaints scheme.
(2) For the purposes of this Part “the regulators” are the FCA, the PRA and the Bank of England, and references to a regulator are to be read accordingly.
(3) The complaints scheme must be designed so that, as far as reasonably practicable, complaints are investigated quickly.
(4) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(5) The terms and conditions on which the investigator is appointed must be such as, in the opinion of the Treasury, are reasonably designed to secure—
(a) that the investigator will be free at all times to act independently of the regulators, and
(b) that complaints will be investigated under the complaints scheme without favouring the regulators.
Your change, as a redline
84 Arrangements for the investigation of complaints
(1) The regulators must—
(a) make arrangements (“the complaints scheme”) for the investigation of complaints arising in connection with the exercise of, or failure to exercise, any of their relevant functions (see section 85). ...
(b) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(1A) The Treasury must appoint an independent person (“the investigator”) to be responsible for the conduct of investigations in accordance with the complaints scheme.
(2) For the purposes of this Part “the regulators” are the FCA, the PRA and the Bank of England, and references to a regulator are to be read accordingly.
(3) The complaints scheme must be designed so that, as far as reasonably practicable, complaints are investigated quickly.
(4) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(5) The terms and conditions on which the investigator is appointed must be such as, in the opinion of the Treasury, are reasonably designed to secure—
(a) that the investigator will be free at all times to act independently of the regulators, and
(b) that complaints will be investigated under the complaints scheme without favouring the regulators.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.