The Armed Forces (Appeals Against Review of Sentence) Regulations 2024
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
10 Evidence
(1) This regulation applies in relation to an appeal or an application for leave to appeal. (2) In this regulation “respondent” includes a person who will be a respondent if leave to appeal is granted. (3) The Appeal Court may— (a) order the production of any document, exhibit or other thing connected with the proceedings, the production of which appears to the Appeal Court necessary for the determination of the case; (b) order any witness to attend for examination and be examined before the Appeal Court (whether or not the witness was called in the proceedings from which the appeal lies); (c) receive any evidence which was not adduced in the proceedings from which the appeal lies. (4) The power conferred by paragraph (3)(a) may be exercised so as to require the production of any document, exhibit or other thing mentioned in that paragraph to— (a) the Appeal Court; (b) the appellant; (c) the respondent. (5) The Appeal Court, in considering whether to receive any evidence, must have regard in particular to— (a) whether the evidence appears to the Appeal Court to be capable of belief; (b) whether it appears to the Appeal Court that the evidence may afford any ground for allowing the appeal. (6) Paragraph (3)(c) applies to any evidence of a witness (including the offender) who is competent but not compellable. (7) For the purposes of an appeal or an application for leave to appeal, the Appeal Court may order the examination of any witness whose attendance may be required under paragraph (3)(b) to be conducted in accordance with the Rules before— (a) any judge of the Appeal Court, or (b) any other person appointed by the Appeal Court for that purpose, and allow the admission of any depositions so taken as evidence before the Appeal Court.
10 Evidence
(1) This regulation applies in relation to an appeal or an application for leave to appeal. (2) In this regulation “respondent” includes a person who will be a respondent if leave to appeal is granted. (3) The Appeal Court may— (a) order the production of any document, exhibit or other thing connected with the proceedings, the production of which appears to the Appeal Court necessary for the determination of the case; (b) order any witness to attend for examination and be examined before the Appeal Court (whether or not the witness was called in the proceedings from which the appeal lies); (c) receive any evidence which was not adduced in the proceedings from which the appeal lies. (4) The power conferred by paragraph (3)(a) may be exercised so as to require the production of any document, exhibit or other thing mentioned in that paragraph to— (a) the Appeal Court; (b) the appellant; (c) the respondent. (5) The Appeal Court, in considering whether to receive any evidence, must have regard in particular to— (a) whether the evidence appears to the Appeal Court to be capable of belief; (b) whether it appears to the Appeal Court that the evidence may afford any ground for allowing the appeal. (6) Paragraph (3)(c) applies to any evidence of a witness (including the offender) who is competent but not compellable. (7) For the purposes of an appeal or an application for leave to appeal, the Appeal Court may order the examination of any witness whose attendance may be required under paragraph (3)(b) to be conducted in accordance with the Rules before— (a) any judge of the Appeal Court, or (b) any other person appointed by the Appeal Court for that purpose, and allow the admission of any depositions so taken as evidence before the Appeal Court.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
How this law is officially changed
Solon does not know this law's official route yet. The proposal is recorded all the same, and the route appears here once its source is added.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.