The Armed Forces (Appeals Against Review of Sentence) Regulations 2024
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
2 Interpretation
In these Regulations— “the 1968 Act” means the Court Martial Appeals Act 1968; “the 2006 Act” means the Armed Forces Act 2006; “advocacy services” means any services which it would be reasonable to expect a person who is exercising, or contemplating exercising, a right of audience in relation to any proceedings, or contemplated proceedings, to provide; “Appeal Court” means the Court Martial Appeal Court; “appellant” means the person who applies for leave to appeal, or who is granted leave to appeal under Parts 2 or 3 of these Regulations; “Director of Service Prosecutions” has the meaning given by section 374 of the 2006 Act; “expert witness costs” means amounts payable in respect of the services of an expert witness, including amounts payable in connection with attendance by the witness at court or elsewhere; “legal costs” means fees, charges, disbursements and other amounts payable in respect of advocacy services or litigation services including, in particular, expert witness costs; “litigation services” means any services which it would be reasonable to expect a person who is exercising, or contemplating exercising, a right to conduct litigation in relation to proceedings, or contemplated proceedings, to provide; “offender” means the person in respect of whom the referral under section 304D(4) or 304E(2) of the 2006 Act is made; “the registrar” means the registrar of the Appeal Court; “the Rules” means Rules of Court made under regulation 39; “sentence”, in relation to an offence, includes any order made by a court when dealing with an offender.
2 Interpretation
In these Regulations— “the 1968 Act” means the Court Martial Appeals Act 1968; “the 2006 Act” means the Armed Forces Act 2006; “advocacy services” means any services which it would be reasonable to expect a person who is exercising, or contemplating exercising, a right of audience in relation to any proceedings, or contemplated proceedings, to provide; “Appeal Court” means the Court Martial Appeal Court; “appellant” means the person who applies for leave to appeal, or who is granted leave to appeal under Parts 2 or 3 of these Regulations; “Director of Service Prosecutions” has the meaning given by section 374 of the 2006 Act; “expert witness costs” means amounts payable in respect of the services of an expert witness, including amounts payable in connection with attendance by the witness at court or elsewhere; “legal costs” means fees, charges, disbursements and other amounts payable in respect of advocacy services or litigation services including, in particular, expert witness costs; “litigation services” means any services which it would be reasonable to expect a person who is exercising, or contemplating exercising, a right to conduct litigation in relation to proceedings, or contemplated proceedings, to provide; “offender” means the person in respect of whom the referral under section 304D(4) or 304E(2) of the 2006 Act is made; “the registrar” means the registrar of the Appeal Court; “the Rules” means Rules of Court made under regulation 39; “sentence”, in relation to an offence, includes any order made by a court when dealing with an offender.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
How this law is officially changed
Solon does not know this law's official route yet. The proposal is recorded all the same, and the route appears here once its source is added.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.